PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGTKX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGTKX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund Class K6 (FGTKX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FGTKX having a 8.76% return and FCNTX slightly higher at 9.08%.


FGTKX

1D
0.84%
1M
-0.05%
6M
5.71%
YTD
8.76%
1Y
16.26%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.17%

FCNTX

1D
2.04%
1M
-0.68%
6M
6.92%
YTD
9.08%
1Y
15.62%
3Y*
25.01%
5Y*
13.67%
10Y*
17.16%
ALL TIME*
13.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FGTKX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund Class K6
8.76%17.95%12.72%15.72%-16.78%11.76%15.91%22.06%-6.81%8.60%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
9.08%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%12.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FGTKX and FCNTX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.84

The correlation between FGTKX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGTKX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGTKX
FGTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FGTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FGTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGTKX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund Class K6 (FGTKX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGTKXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.20

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

1.55

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.38

6.03

+4.35

FGTKX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGTKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGTKX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGTKX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGTKX drawdown since its inception was -24.66%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGTKX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGTKXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.66%

-49.19%

+24.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.86%

-11.30%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.98%

-19.75%

+9.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.18%

-32.59%

+8.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-2.18%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-8.14%

+3.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.91%

-1.23%

Volatility

FGTKX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund Class K6 (FGTKX) is 3.00%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 4.63%. This indicates that FGTKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGTKXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

4.63%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.43%

12.38%

-3.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.81%

15.43%

-5.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.98%

19.40%

-8.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.72%

19.75%

-8.03%

FGTKX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGTKX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGTKX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FGTKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%, more than FCNTX's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.28%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FGTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund Class K6
6.35%5.75%6.28%2.18%10.38%11.19%6.49%7.08%7.77%3.24%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGTKX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCNTX has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to FGTKX (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGTKX dropped -24.66% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FGTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGTKX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer