PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGSI vs. SPIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGSI vs. SPIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGSI achieves a 8.34% return, which is significantly higher than SPIN's 3.96% return.


FGSI

1D
0.31%
1M
1.55%
6M
6.78%
YTD
8.34%
1Y
11.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.03%

SPIN

1D
1.24%
1M
1.15%
6M
2.65%
YTD
3.96%
1Y
14.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.03K$2.79K$11.92K
$106.05K$178.20K$136.27K

FGSI vs. SPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FGSI and SPIN is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.77

The correlation between FGSI and SPIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

FGSI vs. SPIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGSI
SPIN

Technology

31.9%
39.0%

Healthcare

18.2%
8.7%

Financial Services

16.0%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

13.3%
8.2%

Industrials

11.3%
8.6%

Communication Services

5.2%
11.1%

Energy

4.8%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
3.7%

Basic Materials

1.6%
2.4%

Real Estate

-

1.5%

Utilities

-

1.9%

Technology

FGSI
31.9%
SPIN
39.0%

Healthcare

FGSI
18.2%
SPIN
8.7%

Financial Services

FGSI
16.0%
SPIN
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FGSI
13.3%
SPIN
8.2%

Industrials

FGSI
11.3%
SPIN
8.6%

Communication Services

FGSI
5.2%
SPIN
11.1%

Energy

FGSI
4.8%
SPIN
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

FGSI
2.5%
SPIN
3.7%

Basic Materials

FGSI
1.6%
SPIN
2.4%

Real Estate

FGSI

-

SPIN
1.5%

Utilities

FGSI

-

SPIN
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGSI vs. SPIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGSI
FGSI Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FGSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FGSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGSI Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

SPIN
SPIN Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGSI vs. SPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGSISPINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.20

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

1.32

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.01

5.27

-1.26

FGSI vs. SPIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGSI Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the SPIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGSI and SPIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGSI vs. SPIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGSI drawdown since its inception was -8.25%, smaller than the maximum SPIN drawdown of -16.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSI and SPIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGSISPINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-16.85%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.25%

-9.81%

+1.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.18%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.84%

-2.21%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.45%

+0.08%

Volatility

FGSI vs. SPIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) is 3.01%, while State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that FGSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGSISPINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

3.43%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

8.79%

+1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.64%

11.62%

+1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.34%

14.25%

-1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.34%

14.25%

-1.91%

FGSI vs. SPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGSI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIN's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGSI vs. SPIN - Dividend Comparison

FGSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.19%, more than SPIN's 5.11% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FGSI and SPIN have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPIN has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to FGSI (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGSI dropped -8.25% vs SPIN's -16.85%.

On 1-year performance, SPIN leads with 14.27% vs 11.13% for FGSI. On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FGSI has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPIN has performed better with a 14.27% return vs 11.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FGSI.

FGSI has the higher dividend yield at 8.19%, compared with 4.76% for SPIN.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FGSI and 0.25% for SPIN.

SPIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGSI and SPIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer