PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGSI vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGSI vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGSI achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.


FGSI

1D
-0.48%
1M
1.94%
6M
3.70%
YTD
6.66%
1Y
9.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SBIT

1D
5.38%
1M
1.44%
6M
58.27%
YTD
44.00%
1Y
124.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGSI vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FGSI and SBIT is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

-0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGSI vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGSI
FGSI Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FGSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGSI Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FGSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGSI Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGSI vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGSISBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.25

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

2.60

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.79

5.92

-2.13

FGSI vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGSI Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGSI and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGSI vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGSI drawdown since its inception was -8.25%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSI and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGSISBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-91.35%

+83.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.25%

-47.94%

+39.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-77.15%

+76.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.89%

-68.83%

+66.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

21.04%

-18.48%

Volatility

FGSI vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) is 3.63%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that FGSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGSISBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

22.98%

-19.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

68.89%

-58.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

88.51%

-75.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.47%

96.89%

-84.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.47%

96.89%

-84.42%

FGSI vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGSI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGSI vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

FGSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.19%, more than SBIT's 3.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FGSI
First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF
8.19%4.20%0.00%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
3.97%0.52%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGSI and SBIT have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to FGSI (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGSI dropped -8.25% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs 9.70% for FGSI. On fees, FGSI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FGSI has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FGSI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

FGSI has the higher dividend yield at 8.19%, compared with 3.97% for SBIT.

FGSI is categorized as Derivative Income, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FGSI and 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGSI and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer