PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGSI vs. GPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGSI vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGSI achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly lower than GPIX's 10.17% return.


FGSI

1D
-0.48%
1M
1.94%
6M
3.70%
YTD
6.66%
1Y
9.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GPIX

1D
-0.63%
1M
1.41%
6M
8.40%
YTD
10.17%
1Y
20.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGSI vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FGSI and GPIX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.78

The correlation between FGSI and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

FGSI vs. GPIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGSI
GPIX

Technology

32.6%
39.2%

Healthcare

17.5%
8.3%

Financial Services

15.3%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
10.1%

Industrials

11.2%
7.7%

Communication Services

6.1%
10.7%

Energy

4.8%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
4.4%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.7%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Technology

FGSI
32.6%
GPIX
39.2%

Healthcare

FGSI
17.5%
GPIX
8.3%

Financial Services

FGSI
15.3%
GPIX
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FGSI
13.2%
GPIX
10.1%

Industrials

FGSI
11.2%
GPIX
7.7%

Communication Services

FGSI
6.1%
GPIX
10.7%

Energy

FGSI
4.8%
GPIX
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

FGSI
2.3%
GPIX
4.4%

Basic Materials

FGSI
1.9%
GPIX
1.7%

Real Estate

FGSI

-

GPIX
1.8%

Utilities

FGSI

-

GPIX
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGSI vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGSI
FGSI Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FGSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGSI Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FGSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGSI Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGSI vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGSIGPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.36

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

2.72

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.79

13.02

-9.22

FGSI vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGSI Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the GPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGSI and GPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGSI vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGSI drawdown since its inception was -8.25%, smaller than the maximum GPIX drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSI and GPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGSIGPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-17.50%

+9.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.25%

-7.71%

-0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.63%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.89%

-1.47%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

1.61%

+0.95%

Volatility

FGSI vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF (FGSI) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) have volatilities of 3.63% and 3.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGSIGPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

3.62%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

8.85%

+1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

10.90%

+1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.47%

13.80%

-1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.47%

13.80%

-1.33%

FGSI vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGSI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGSI vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

FGSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.19%, which matches GPIX's 8.11% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FGSI
First Trust Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF
8.19%4.20%0.00%0.00%
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.11%8.01%7.45%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGSI and GPIX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGSI has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to GPIX (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGSI dropped -8.25% vs GPIX's -17.50%.

On 1-year performance, GPIX leads with 20.86% vs 9.70% for FGSI. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GPIX has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FGSI.

FGSI has the higher dividend yield at 8.19%, compared with 8.11% for GPIX.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FGSI and 0.29% for GPIX.

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGSI and GPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer