FGROX vs. VRTGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FGROX (Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class) and VRTGX (Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FGROX returned 16.88%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for VRTGX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FGROX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VRTGX.

Performance

FGROX vs. VRTGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGROX achieves a 35.00% return, which is significantly higher than VRTGX's 22.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FGROX has outperformed VRTGX with an annualized return of 16.88%, while VRTGX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.34% annualized return.

FGROX

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: 10.20%
• YTD: 35.00%
• 6M: 30.53%
• 1Y: 74.67%
• 3Y*: 32.48%
• 5Y*: 13.44%
• 10Y*: 16.88%

VRTGX

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: 5.93%
• YTD: 22.19%
• 6M: 18.81%
• 1Y: 42.31%
• 3Y*: 19.93%
• 5Y*: 5.90%
• 10Y*: 12.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGROX vs. VRTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	35.00%	31.85%	20.04%	19.04%	-24.42%	3.91%	38.92%	28.71%	-11.85%	28.11%
VRTGX Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	22.19%	12.97%	15.26%	18.80%	-26.30%	2.82%	34.81%	28.84%	-9.21%	22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FGROX and VRTGX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010	0.96

The correlation between FGROX and VRTGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGROX vs. VRTGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGROX

FGROX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FGROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FGROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FGROX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FGROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FGROX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

VRTGX

VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 52
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGROX vs. VRTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGROX	VRTGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.94	1.97	+0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	2.66	+0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.32	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.43	2.96	+2.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.68	10.59	+12.09

FGROX vs. VRTGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGROX Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is higher than the VRTGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGROX and VRTGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGROX vs. VRTGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGROX drawdown since its inception was -41.48%, roughly equal to the maximum VRTGX drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGROX and VRTGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGROX	VRTGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.48%	-41.97%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.36%	-14.80%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.61%	-28.54%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.52%	-40.48%	+1.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.48%	-41.97%	+0.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.22%	-10.41%	+0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.42%	4.13%	-0.71%

Volatility

FGROX vs. VRTGX - Volatility Comparison

Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) at 7.67%. This indicates that FGROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRTGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGROX	VRTGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.29%	7.67%	+1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.49%	16.77%	+3.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.56%	22.26%	+4.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.84%	24.71%	+1.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.31%	24.59%	+0.72%

FGROX vs. VRTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGROX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTGX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGROX vs. VRTGX - Dividend Comparison

FGROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.44%, more than VRTGX's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	8.44%	11.39%	13.92%	5.91%	8.13%	17.87%	8.04%	1.38%	11.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRTGX Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	0.60%	0.57%	0.62%	0.85%	0.78%	0.54%	0.53%	0.90%	0.85%	0.75%	1.07%	0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGROX and VRTGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FGROX and VRTGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FGROX or VRTGX?

FGROX has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to VRTGX (7.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGROX dropped -41.48% vs VRTGX's -41.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.