FGROX vs. UMBHX
FGROX (Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class) and UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGROX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UMBHX.
Performance
FGROX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FGROX
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 26.22%
- 6M
- 24.64%
- 1Y
- 68.45%
- 3Y*
- 29.82%
- 5Y*
- 12.60%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
UMBHX
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FGROX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class | 0.08% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGROX and UMBHX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGROX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank
FGROX
UMBHX
FGROX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGROX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.90 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.57 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.11 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.59 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGROX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 1.79 | -1.27 |
Drawdowns
FGROX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGROX drawdown since its inception was -41.48%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGROX and UMBHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGROX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.48% | -1.86% | -39.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.25% | -0.84% | -9.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | — | — |
Volatility
FGROX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGROX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.34% | 30.30% | -4.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.58% | 30.30% | -4.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.18% | 30.30% | -5.12% |
FGROX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGROX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGROX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison
FGROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.02%, while UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class | 9.02% | 11.39% | 13.92% | 5.91% | 8.13% | 17.87% | 8.04% | 1.38% | 11.36% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGROX and UMBHX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FGROX and UMBHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer