PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGROX vs. UMBHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGROX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FGROX

1D
1.61%
1M
7.35%
YTD
26.22%
6M
24.64%
1Y
68.45%
3Y*
29.82%
5Y*
12.60%
10Y*
15.70%

UMBHX

1D
2.34%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGROX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FGROX and UMBHX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGROX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGROX
FGROX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FGROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGROX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FGROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGROX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

UMBHX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGROX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGROXUMBHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.59

FGROX vs. UMBHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGROXUMBHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

1.79

-1.27

Drawdowns

FGROX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGROX drawdown since its inception was -41.48%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGROX and UMBHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGROXUMBHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.48%

-1.86%

-39.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.25%

-0.84%

-9.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

Volatility

FGROX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGROXUMBHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.34%

30.30%

-4.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.58%

30.30%

-4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.18%

30.30%

-5.12%

FGROX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGROX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGROX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison

FGROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.02%, while UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FGROX
Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class
9.02%11.39%13.92%5.91%8.13%17.87%8.04%1.38%11.36%
UMBHX
Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGROX and UMBHX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGROX and UMBHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer