FGROX vs. MNDIX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FGROX (Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class) and MNDIX (MFS New Discovery Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FGROX returned 15.09%/yr vs 11.31%/yr for MNDIX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FGROX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MNDIX.

Performance

FGROX vs. MNDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX) and MFS New Discovery Fund (MNDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGROX achieves a 23.70% return, which is significantly higher than MNDIX's 11.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FGROX has outperformed MNDIX with an annualized return of 15.09%, while MNDIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.31% annualized return.

FGROX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -7.34%
• 6M: 15.91%
• YTD: 23.70%
• 1Y: 51.95%
• 3Y*: 25.37%
• 5Y*: 11.85%
• 10Y*: 15.09%
• ALL TIME*: 12.98%

MNDIX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -3.26%
• 6M: 6.56%
• YTD: 11.82%
• 1Y: 22.58%
• 3Y*: 10.26%
• 5Y*: 0.28%
• 10Y*: 11.31%
• ALL TIME*: 10.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MNDIX MFS New Discovery Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FGROX vs. MNDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	23.70%	31.85%	20.04%	19.04%	-24.42%	3.91%	38.92%	28.71%	-11.85%	28.11%
MNDIX MFS New Discovery Fund	11.82%	12.62%	6.32%	14.30%	-29.64%	2.03%	45.14%	41.12%	-1.41%	26.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FGROX and MNDIX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2008	0.93

The correlation between FGROX and MNDIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGROX vs. MNDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGROX

FGROX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FGROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FGROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FGROX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FGROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FGROX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

MNDIX

MNDIX Risk / Return Rank: 31
MNDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
MNDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
MNDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
MNDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
MNDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGROX vs. MNDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX) and MFS New Discovery Fund (MNDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGROX	MNDIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.05	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	1.58	+0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.19	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.48	1.58	+1.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.12	5.67	+6.45

FGROX vs. MNDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGROX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the MNDIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGROX and MNDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGROX vs. MNDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGROX drawdown since its inception was -41.48%, smaller than the maximum MNDIX drawdown of -62.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGROX and MNDIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGROX	MNDIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.48%	-62.02%	+20.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.36%	-13.42%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.61%	-25.32%	-3.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.52%	-42.04%	+3.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.48%	-42.04%	+0.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.55%	-4.63%	-5.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.20%	-16.75%	+6.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.11%	3.73%	+0.38%

Volatility

FGROX vs. MNDIX - Volatility Comparison

Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX) has a higher volatility of 8.22% compared to MFS New Discovery Fund (MNDIX) at 4.91%. This indicates that FGROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGROX	MNDIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.22%	4.91%	+3.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.61%	16.02%	+5.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.66%	20.36%	+7.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.01%	22.98%	+3.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.36%	22.08%	+3.28%

FGROX vs. MNDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGROX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than MNDIX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGROX vs. MNDIX - Dividend Comparison

FGROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.21%, while MNDIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	9.21%	11.39%	13.92%	5.91%	8.13%	17.87%	8.04%	1.38%	11.36%	0.00%	0.00%
MNDIX MFS New Discovery Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.09%	20.76%	9.22%	7.01%	23.11%	9.34%	2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGROX and MNDIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FGROX and MNDIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FGROX or MNDIX?

FGROX has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to MNDIX (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGROX dropped -41.48% vs MNDIX's -62.02%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.