FGRO.NEO vs. FCIL.NEO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF (FGRO.NEO) and Fidelity International Low Volatility ETF (FCIL.NEO).
FGRO.NEO and FCIL.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FGRO.NEO is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021. FCIL.NEO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Canada International Low Volatility Index. It was launched on Jan 18, 2019.
Performance
FGRO.NEO vs. FCIL.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGRO.NEO vs. FCIL.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGRO.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF | 1.81% | 17.00% | 25.97% | 16.92% | -6.29% | 16.51% |
FCIL.NEO Fidelity International Low Volatility ETF | 6.71% | 19.10% | 7.89% | 11.49% | -6.83% | 7.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGRO.NEO achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than FCIL.NEO's 6.71% return.
FGRO.NEO
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -3.27%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 3.61%
- 1Y
- 16.60%
- 3Y*
- 18.32%
- 5Y*
- 13.52%
- 10Y*
- —
FCIL.NEO
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 6M
- 9.83%
- 1Y
- 17.46%
- 3Y*
- 13.08%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGRO.NEO vs. FCIL.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGRO.NEO has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FCIL.NEO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGRO.NEO vs. FCIL.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
FGRO.NEO
FCIL.NEO
FGRO.NEO vs. FCIL.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF (FGRO.NEO) and Fidelity International Low Volatility ETF (FCIL.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGRO.NEO | FCIL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | 1.09 | +0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 1.60 | +0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.23 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 1.86 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.02 | 5.05 | +1.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGRO.NEO | FCIL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 1.09 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.30 | 0.73 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.28 | 0.56 | +0.72 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGRO.NEO and FCIL.NEO is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FGRO.NEO vs. FCIL.NEO - Dividend Comparison
FGRO.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, while FCIL.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGRO.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF | 1.22% | 1.24% | 1.09% | 1.39% | 4.58% | 0.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCIL.NEO Fidelity International Low Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.94% | 2.44% | 2.53% | 3.78% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
FGRO.NEO vs. FCIL.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGRO.NEO drawdown since its inception was -15.23%, smaller than the maximum FCIL.NEO drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRO.NEO and FCIL.NEO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGRO.NEO | FCIL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.23% | -20.28% | +5.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -9.17% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.23% | -20.28% | +5.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.91% | -3.88% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.58% | -4.53% | +1.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 3.37% | -0.99% |
Volatility
FGRO.NEO vs. FCIL.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity All-in-One Growth ETF (FGRO.NEO) is 4.87%, while Fidelity International Low Volatility ETF (FCIL.NEO) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that FGRO.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCIL.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGRO.NEO | FCIL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 6.18% | -1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.78% | 9.57% | -1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 16.03% | -4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.49% | 12.80% | -2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.46% | 13.65% | -3.19% |