PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGRIX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGRIX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FGRIX having a 7.63% return and FCNTX slightly higher at 7.76%. Over the past 10 years, FGRIX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 14.33%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.


FGRIX

1D
-0.01%
1M
2.58%
YTD
7.63%
6M
9.20%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
13.55%
10Y*
14.33%

FCNTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.65%
YTD
7.76%
6M
10.05%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
17.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGRIX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGRIX
Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio
7.63%21.59%22.10%18.63%-4.98%25.84%7.98%30.22%-8.94%16.88%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
7.76%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FGRIX and FCNTX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1985

0.86

The correlation between FGRIX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

FGRIX vs. FCNTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGRIX
FCNTX

Technology

20.3%
27.0%

Industrials

17.7%
8.6%

Financial Services

16.7%
13.8%

Energy

13.0%
3.6%

Healthcare

11.8%
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
3.7%

Communication Services

5.5%
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
10.1%

Utilities

2.5%
0.5%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.0%
2.1%

Technology

FGRIX
20.3%
FCNTX
27.0%

Industrials

FGRIX
17.7%
FCNTX
8.6%

Financial Services

FGRIX
16.7%
FCNTX
13.8%

Energy

FGRIX
13.0%
FCNTX
3.6%

Healthcare

FGRIX
11.8%
FCNTX
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

FGRIX
7.1%
FCNTX
3.7%

Communication Services

FGRIX
5.5%
FCNTX
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FGRIX
3.4%
FCNTX
10.1%

Utilities

FGRIX
2.5%
FCNTX
0.5%

Real Estate

FGRIX
1.1%
FCNTX
0.1%

Basic Materials

FGRIX
1.0%
FCNTX
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGRIX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGRIX
FGRIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FGRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FGRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGRIX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGRIXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.31

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

2.13

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.11

9.04

+3.07

FGRIX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGRIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGRIX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGRIXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

1.72

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.79

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.89

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.78

-0.18

Drawdowns

FGRIX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGRIX drawdown since its inception was -67.10%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRIX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGRIXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.10%

-49.19%

-17.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-11.30%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.42%

-19.75%

+3.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.26%

-32.59%

+13.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.63%

-32.59%

-3.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.53%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.12%

-8.16%

-1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.65%

-0.66%

Volatility

FGRIX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX) is 2.36%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that FGRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGRIXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

3.26%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.97%

10.48%

-2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.64%

14.03%

-3.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.52%

19.15%

-3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.45%

19.68%

-2.23%

FGRIX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGRIX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGRIX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FGRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.10%, more than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.33%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FGRIX
Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio
9.10%9.78%6.80%3.93%3.43%6.02%3.61%2.85%3.39%1.52%1.80%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGRIX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCNTX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to FGRIX (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGRIX dropped -67.10% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FGRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGRIX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer