PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGRIX vs. FALIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGRIX vs. FALIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FGRIX having a 14.33% annualized return and FALIX not far behind at 14.12%.


FGRIX

1D
-0.01%
1M
2.58%
YTD
7.63%
6M
9.20%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
13.55%
10Y*
14.33%

FALIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
14.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGRIX vs. FALIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGRIX
Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio
7.63%21.59%22.10%18.63%-4.98%25.84%7.98%30.22%-8.94%16.88%
FALIX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I
0.00%19.65%26.36%23.49%-7.91%25.81%8.85%31.71%-8.42%16.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FGRIX and FALIX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 1996

0.97

Over the past year, the correlation between FGRIX and FALIX has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.97, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FGRIX vs. FALIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGRIX
FALIX

Technology

20.3%
25.2%

Industrials

17.7%
18.9%

Financial Services

16.7%
15.6%

Energy

13.0%
8.5%

Healthcare

11.8%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
4.3%

Communication Services

5.5%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
2.9%

Utilities

2.5%
1.1%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.7%

Basic Materials

1.0%
2.3%

Technology

FGRIX
20.3%
FALIX
25.2%

Industrials

FGRIX
17.7%
FALIX
18.9%

Financial Services

FGRIX
16.7%
FALIX
15.6%

Energy

FGRIX
13.0%
FALIX
8.5%

Healthcare

FGRIX
11.8%
FALIX
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

FGRIX
7.1%
FALIX
4.3%

Communication Services

FGRIX
5.5%
FALIX
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FGRIX
3.4%
FALIX
2.9%

Utilities

FGRIX
2.5%
FALIX
1.1%

Real Estate

FGRIX
1.1%
FALIX
0.7%

Basic Materials

FGRIX
1.0%
FALIX
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGRIX vs. FALIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGRIX
FGRIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FGRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FGRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FALIX
FALIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FALIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FALIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGRIX vs. FALIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGRIXFALIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.27

1.81

+0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.18

2.54

+0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.49

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

2.89

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.11

4.92

+7.18

FGRIX vs. FALIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGRIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the FALIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGRIX and FALIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGRIXFALIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

1.81

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.78

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.77

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.48

+0.12

Drawdowns

FGRIX vs. FALIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGRIX drawdown since its inception was -67.10%, which is greater than FALIX's maximum drawdown of -62.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRIX and FALIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGRIXFALIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.10%

-62.37%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-5.03%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.42%

-18.89%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.26%

-21.48%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.63%

-37.51%

+1.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-4.17%

+4.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.12%

-13.28%

+3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.78%

-0.79%

Volatility

FGRIX vs. FALIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX) has a higher volatility of 2.36% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that FGRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGRIXFALIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

0.00%

+2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.97%

4.20%

+3.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.64%

8.06%

+2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.52%

16.44%

-0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.45%

18.58%

-1.13%

FGRIX vs. FALIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGRIX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FALIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGRIX vs. FALIX - Dividend Comparison

FGRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.10%, more than FALIX's 5.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FALIX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I
5.86%5.86%6.10%3.43%2.28%6.51%5.39%8.35%16.78%6.13%2.25%3.16%
FGRIX
Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio
9.10%9.78%6.80%3.93%3.43%6.02%3.61%2.85%3.39%1.52%1.80%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGRIX and FALIX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGRIX has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to FALIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGRIX dropped -67.10% vs FALIX's -62.37%.

FGRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGRIX and FALIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer