FGRIX vs. EKHAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX) and Allspring High Yield Bond Fund (EKHAX).
FGRIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 30, 1985. EKHAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 20, 1998.
Performance
FGRIX vs. EKHAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGRIX vs. EKHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGRIX Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio | -0.48% | 21.59% | 22.10% | 18.63% | -4.98% | 25.84% | 7.98% | 30.22% | -8.94% | 16.88% |
EKHAX Allspring High Yield Bond Fund | -0.92% | 7.58% | 8.02% | 10.84% | -11.70% | 2.66% | 5.43% | 15.22% | -5.42% | 6.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGRIX achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly higher than EKHAX's -0.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FGRIX has outperformed EKHAX with an annualized return of 13.81%, while EKHAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.43% annualized return.
FGRIX
- 1D
- 2.61%
- 1M
- -4.82%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 6M
- 3.14%
- 1Y
- 20.96%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- 13.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.81%
EKHAX
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- -0.92%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 5.83%
- 3Y*
- 7.43%
- 5Y*
- 3.03%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGRIX vs. EKHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGRIX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than EKHAX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGRIX vs. EKHAX — Risk / Return Rank
FGRIX
EKHAX
FGRIX vs. EKHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX) and Allspring High Yield Bond Fund (EKHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGRIX | EKHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 1.36 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 2.07 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.36 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 1.94 | -0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.41 | 8.07 | +0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGRIX | EKHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.36 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.56 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.75 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.86 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGRIX and EKHAX is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FGRIX vs. EKHAX - Dividend Comparison
FGRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.83%, more than EKHAX's 6.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGRIX Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio | 9.83% | 9.78% | 6.80% | 3.93% | 3.43% | 6.02% | 3.61% | 2.85% | 3.39% | 1.52% | 1.80% | 2.08% |
EKHAX Allspring High Yield Bond Fund | 6.08% | 6.60% | 6.66% | 6.04% | 4.66% | 3.20% | 3.62% | 4.09% | 4.63% | 4.27% | 4.17% | 4.26% |
Drawdowns
FGRIX vs. EKHAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGRIX drawdown since its inception was -67.10%, which is greater than EKHAX's maximum drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRIX and EKHAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGRIX | EKHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.10% | -34.70% | -32.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -3.00% | -8.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.26% | -15.40% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.62% | -19.75% | -15.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.95% | -1.64% | -4.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.16% | -3.44% | -6.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 0.72% | +1.89% |
Volatility
FGRIX vs. EKHAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Growth & Income Portfolio (FGRIX) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Allspring High Yield Bond Fund (EKHAX) at 1.65%. This indicates that FGRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EKHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGRIX | EKHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 1.65% | +3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.64% | 2.92% | +5.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.49% | 4.31% | +12.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 5.45% | +10.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 5.88% | +11.60% |