FGQD.L vs. ZPRX.DE

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

FGQD.L (Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF) and ZPRX.DE (SPDR MSCI Europe Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FGQD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Global Quality Income index, while ZPRX.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Small Cap Value Weighted. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FGQD.L returned 11.84%/yr vs 8.34%/yr for ZPRX.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGQD.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZPRX.DE.

Performance

FGQD.L vs. ZPRX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FGQD.L is traded in GBp, while ZPRX.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ZPRX.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGQD.L achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly higher than ZPRX.DE's 7.58% return.

FGQD.L

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 2.70%
• YTD: 10.74%
• 6M: 10.84%
• 1Y: 27.46%
• 3Y*: 15.11%
• 5Y*: 11.84%
• 10Y*: —

ZPRX.DE

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 2.88%
• YTD: 7.58%
• 6M: 9.43%
• 1Y: 20.92%
• 3Y*: 15.34%
• 5Y*: 8.34%
• 10Y*: 9.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGQD.L vs. ZPRX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGQD.L Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF	10.74%	12.15%	13.21%	11.51%	-0.25%	23.78%	6.42%	23.83%	-2.25%	-14.04%
ZPRX.DE SPDR MSCI Europe Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF	7.58%	33.41%	-0.25%	12.96%	-8.78%	18.59%	1.93%	22.28%	-18.05%	12.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FGQD.L and ZPRX.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017	0.62

The correlation between FGQD.L and ZPRX.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGQD.L vs. ZPRX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGQD.L

FGQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FGQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FGQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FGQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FGQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 87

ZPRX.DE

ZPRX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 40
ZPRX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
ZPRX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ZPRX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 41
ZPRX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
ZPRX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGQD.L vs. ZPRX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGQD.L	ZPRX.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	1.52	+1.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	2.21	+1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.27	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.79	1.69	+2.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.00	6.14	+10.86

FGQD.L vs. ZPRX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the ZPRX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGQD.L and ZPRX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGQD.L vs. ZPRX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGQD.L drawdown since its inception was -26.43%, smaller than the maximum ZPRX.DE drawdown of -39.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGQD.L and ZPRX.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGQD.L	ZPRX.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.43%	-39.68%	+13.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.22%	-12.35%	+5.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.90%	-14.77%	-2.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.90%	-24.08%	+7.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.59%	+0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.63%	-6.57%	+0.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.61%	3.40%	-1.79%

Volatility

FGQD.L vs. ZPRX.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) is 3.04%, while SPDR MSCI Europe Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRX.DE) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that FGQD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZPRX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGQD.L	ZPRX.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.04%	3.73%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.57%	11.38%	-3.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.81%	13.74%	-3.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.22%	16.57%	-4.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.46%	17.28%	-1.82%

FGQD.L vs. ZPRX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGQD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPRX.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGQD.L vs. ZPRX.DE - Dividend Comparison

FGQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, while ZPRX.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGQD.L Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF	1.80%	1.86%	2.31%	2.78%	2.70%	2.46%	2.60%	2.44%	2.70%	1.10%
ZPRX.DE SPDR MSCI Europe Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGQD.L and ZPRX.DE in my portfolio?

FGQD.L and ZPRX.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FGQD.L or ZPRX.DE?

On fees, ZPRX.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FGQD.L or ZPRX.DE?

ZPRX.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FGQD.L.

What is the main difference between FGQD.L and ZPRX.DE?

FGQD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ZPRX.DE is Europe Equities. FGQD.L tracks Fidelity Global Quality Income index, while ZPRX.DE tracks MSCI Europe Small Cap Value Weighted. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FGQD.L and 0.30% for ZPRX.DE.