PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGQD.L vs. ZPRV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGQD.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FGQD.L is traded in GBp, while ZPRV.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ZPRV.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGQD.L achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly lower than ZPRV.DE's 16.83% return.


FGQD.L

1D
0.92%
1M
2.70%
YTD
10.74%
6M
10.84%
1Y
27.46%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*

ZPRV.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
6.00%
YTD
16.83%
6M
15.48%
1Y
40.03%
3Y*
17.34%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
13.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGQD.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGQD.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF
10.74%12.15%13.21%11.51%-0.25%23.78%6.42%23.83%-2.25%-14.04%
ZPRV.DE
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF
16.83%8.35%9.10%16.73%-0.22%37.76%3.67%20.78%-10.52%3.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FGQD.L and ZPRV.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017

0.72

The correlation between FGQD.L and ZPRV.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGQD.L vs. ZPRV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGQD.L
FGQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPRV.DE
ZPRV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ZPRV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGQD.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGQD.LZPRV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.47

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

6.10

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.00

19.94

-2.93

FGQD.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the ZPRV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGQD.L and ZPRV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGQD.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGQD.L drawdown since its inception was -26.43%, smaller than the maximum ZPRV.DE drawdown of -43.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGQD.L and ZPRV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGQD.LZPRV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.43%

-43.48%

+17.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-6.53%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.90%

-29.61%

+12.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.90%

-29.61%

+12.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-8.72%

+3.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

2.00%

-0.39%

Volatility

FGQD.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE) have volatilities of 3.04% and 2.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGQD.LZPRV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

2.94%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

9.55%

-1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.81%

15.14%

-5.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.22%

19.84%

-7.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.46%

22.26%

-6.80%

FGQD.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGQD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPRV.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGQD.L vs. ZPRV.DE - Dividend Comparison

FGQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, while ZPRV.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGQD.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF
1.80%1.86%2.31%2.78%2.70%2.46%2.60%2.44%2.70%1.10%
ZPRV.DE
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGQD.L and ZPRV.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPRV.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPRV.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FGQD.L.

FGQD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ZPRV.DE is Small Cap Value Equities. FGQD.L tracks Fidelity Global Quality Income index, while ZPRV.DE tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FGQD.L and 0.30% for ZPRV.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGQD.L and ZPRV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer