PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGQD.L vs. IWVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGQD.L vs. IWVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FGQD.L is traded in GBp, while IWVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IWVG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGQD.L achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly lower than IWVG.L's 34.35% return.


FGQD.L

1D
0.18%
1M
4.38%
YTD
10.28%
6M
10.17%
1Y
26.89%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*

IWVG.L

1D
-0.61%
1M
13.03%
YTD
34.35%
6M
35.94%
1Y
63.14%
3Y*
25.28%
5Y*
16.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGQD.L vs. IWVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FGQD.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF
10.28%11.78%13.21%11.51%-0.25%23.78%6.42%23.83%0.48%
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
34.35%27.50%5.20%13.05%1.04%21.47%-6.83%14.46%-8.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FGQD.L and IWVG.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2018

0.78

The correlation between FGQD.L and IWVG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FGQD.L vs. IWVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGQD.L
IWVG.L

Technology

30.7%
33.9%

Financial Services

15.9%
14.8%

Industrials

11.7%
11.3%

Healthcare

8.8%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
7.9%

Communication Services

8.4%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.5%

Energy

3.9%
3.8%

Basic Materials

3.0%
3.0%

Utilities

2.5%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.8%

Technology

FGQD.L
30.7%
IWVG.L
33.9%

Financial Services

FGQD.L
15.9%
IWVG.L
14.8%

Industrials

FGQD.L
11.7%
IWVG.L
11.3%

Healthcare

FGQD.L
8.8%
IWVG.L
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FGQD.L
8.6%
IWVG.L
7.9%

Communication Services

FGQD.L
8.4%
IWVG.L
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

FGQD.L
4.7%
IWVG.L
4.5%

Energy

FGQD.L
3.9%
IWVG.L
3.8%

Basic Materials

FGQD.L
3.0%
IWVG.L
3.0%

Utilities

FGQD.L
2.5%
IWVG.L
2.5%

Real Estate

FGQD.L
1.9%
IWVG.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGQD.L vs. IWVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGQD.L
FGQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

IWVG.L
IWVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGQD.L vs. IWVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGQD.LIWVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.88

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

8.95

-5.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.82

33.30

-16.48

FGQD.L vs. IWVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is lower than the IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGQD.L and IWVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGQD.LIWVG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01

4.70

-1.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

1.26

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.73

+0.13

Drawdowns

FGQD.L vs. IWVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGQD.L drawdown since its inception was -26.43%, smaller than the maximum IWVG.L drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGQD.L and IWVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGQD.LIWVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.43%

-28.07%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-7.02%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.90%

-13.79%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.90%

-13.79%

-3.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.61%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-4.31%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.89%

-0.30%

Volatility

FGQD.L vs. IWVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) is 1.88%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that FGQD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGQD.LIWVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.88%

5.50%

-3.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.37%

10.95%

-4.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.89%

13.37%

-4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.07%

13.07%

-1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.61%

15.56%

-0.95%

FGQD.L vs. IWVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGQD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IWVG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGQD.L vs. IWVG.L - Dividend Comparison

FGQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, while IWVG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGQD.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF
1.81%1.87%2.31%2.78%2.69%2.46%2.60%2.44%2.70%1.56%
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.00%0.00%1.82%3.23%3.12%2.61%2.37%2.90%2.48%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGQD.L and IWVG.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWVG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWVG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FGQD.L.

FGQD.L tracks Fidelity Global Quality Income index, while IWVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for FGQD.L and 0.30% for IWVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGQD.L and IWVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer