FGLS.NEO vs. FCUV.TO
FGLS.NEO (Fidelity Global Value Long/Short Alternative ETF) and FCUV.TO (Fidelity U.S. Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FGLS.NEO is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FCUV.TO is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Canada U.S. Value Index. FGLS.NEO is actively managed, while FCUV.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, FGLS.NEO returned 8.09% vs 33.78% for FCUV.TO. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. FGLS.NEO charges 1.51%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for FCUV.TO.
Performance
FGLS.NEO vs. FCUV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGLS.NEO achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly lower than FCUV.TO's 18.19% return.
FGLS.NEO
- 1D
- 5.45%
- 1M
- 9.25%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- YTD
- 6.44%
- 1Y
- 8.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.78%
FCUV.TO
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 15.78%
- YTD
- 18.19%
- 1Y
- 33.78%
- 3Y*
- 24.64%
- 5Y*
- 21.13%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 23.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FCUV.TO Fidelity U.S. Value ETF | CA$2.56M | CA$2.22M | CA$1.95M |
| CA$98.45K | CA$628.31K | CA$493.48K |
FGLS.NEO vs. FCUV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FGLS.NEO Fidelity Global Value Long/Short Alternative ETF | 6.44% | 8.38% | -21.20% |
FCUV.TO Fidelity U.S. Value ETF | 18.19% | 14.83% | 32.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGLS.NEO and FCUV.TO is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGLS.NEO vs. FCUV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FGLS.NEO
FCUV.TO
FGLS.NEO vs. FCUV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Value Long/Short Alternative ETF (FGLS.NEO) and Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGLS.NEO | FCUV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.40 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 5.07 | -4.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.78 | 16.85 | -16.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGLS.NEO vs. FCUV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGLS.NEO drawdown since its inception was -25.89%, which is greater than FCUV.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGLS.NEO and FCUV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGLS.NEO | FCUV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.89% | -16.47% | -9.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.12% | -6.70% | -14.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.21% | -1.28% | -7.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.41% | -2.49% | -11.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.39% | 2.01% | +8.38% |
Volatility
FGLS.NEO vs. FCUV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Global Value Long/Short Alternative ETF (FGLS.NEO) has a higher volatility of 12.93% compared to Fidelity U.S. Value ETF (FCUV.TO) at 4.49%. This indicates that FGLS.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCUV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGLS.NEO | FCUV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.93% | 4.49% | +8.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.31% | 11.00% | +11.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.32% | 15.14% | +13.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 15.39% | +8.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 14.85% | +9.50% |
FGLS.NEO vs. FCUV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGLS.NEO has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FCUV.TO's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGLS.NEO vs. FCUV.TO - Dividend Comparison
FGLS.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCUV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCUV.TO Fidelity U.S. Value ETF | 0.87% | 1.14% | 1.03% | 1.43% | 2.71% | 1.10% | 3.42% |
FGLS.NEO Fidelity Global Value Long/Short Alternative ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGLS.NEO and FCUV.TO have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCUV.TO is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCUV.TO is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.51% for FGLS.NEO.
FGLS.NEO is categorized as Long-Short, while FCUV.TO is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.51% for FGLS.NEO and 0.38% for FCUV.TO.
Find the right allocation for FGLS.NEO and FCUV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer