FGLS.NEO vs. FCCM.NEO
FGLS.NEO (Fidelity Global Value Long/Short Alternative ETF) and FCCM.NEO (Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FGLS.NEO is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FCCM.NEO is a Momentum fund tracking the Fidelity Canada Canadian Momentum Index. FGLS.NEO is actively managed, while FCCM.NEO is passively managed. Over the past year, FGLS.NEO returned 8.09% vs 40.55% for FCCM.NEO. At a correlation of -0.24, they often move in opposite directions. FGLS.NEO charges 1.51%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for FCCM.NEO.
Performance
FGLS.NEO vs. FCCM.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGLS.NEO achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly lower than FCCM.NEO's 12.08% return.
FGLS.NEO
- 1D
- 5.45%
- 1M
- 9.25%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- YTD
- 6.44%
- 1Y
- 8.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.78%
FCCM.NEO
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- 6M
- 5.03%
- YTD
- 12.08%
- 1Y
- 40.55%
- 3Y*
- 28.47%
- 5Y*
- 18.77%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$541.70K | CA$753.19K | CA$932.82K | |
| CA$98.45K | CA$628.31K | CA$493.48K |
FGLS.NEO vs. FCCM.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FGLS.NEO Fidelity Global Value Long/Short Alternative ETF | 6.44% | 8.38% | -21.20% |
FCCM.NEO Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF | 12.08% | 43.17% | 23.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGLS.NEO and FCCM.NEO is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024 | -0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGLS.NEO vs. FCCM.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
FGLS.NEO
FCCM.NEO
FGLS.NEO vs. FCCM.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Value Long/Short Alternative ETF (FGLS.NEO) and Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF (FCCM.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGLS.NEO | FCCM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.45 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 3.30 | -2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.78 | 13.77 | -12.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGLS.NEO vs. FCCM.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGLS.NEO drawdown since its inception was -25.89%, which is greater than FCCM.NEO's maximum drawdown of -16.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGLS.NEO and FCCM.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGLS.NEO | FCCM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.89% | -16.59% | -9.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.12% | -12.36% | -8.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.21% | -0.33% | -8.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.41% | -2.58% | -11.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.39% | 2.95% | +7.44% |
Volatility
FGLS.NEO vs. FCCM.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Global Value Long/Short Alternative ETF (FGLS.NEO) has a higher volatility of 12.93% compared to Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF (FCCM.NEO) at 2.67%. This indicates that FGLS.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCCM.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGLS.NEO | FCCM.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.93% | 2.67% | +10.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.31% | 13.55% | +8.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.32% | 16.47% | +11.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 13.71% | +10.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 13.47% | +10.88% |
FGLS.NEO vs. FCCM.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGLS.NEO has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FCCM.NEO's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGLS.NEO vs. FCCM.NEO - Dividend Comparison
FGLS.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCCM.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCCM.NEO Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF | 0.81% | 0.91% | 0.91% | 1.32% | 1.79% | 1.49% | 0.78% |
FGLS.NEO Fidelity Global Value Long/Short Alternative ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGLS.NEO and FCCM.NEO have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCCM.NEO is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCCM.NEO is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.51% for FGLS.NEO.
FGLS.NEO is categorized as Long-Short, while FCCM.NEO is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 1.51% for FGLS.NEO and 0.38% for FCCM.NEO.
Find the right allocation for FGLS.NEO and FCCM.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer