PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGLR.DE vs. FESD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGLR.DE vs. FESD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLR.DE) and Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGLR.DE achieves a 9.94% return, which is significantly higher than FESD.DE's 3.41% return.


FGLR.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
4.17%
YTD
9.94%
6M
10.09%
1Y
22.01%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*

FESD.DE

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.35%
YTD
3.41%
6M
3.08%
1Y
9.14%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGLR.DE vs. FESD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FGLR.DE
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc
9.94%5.43%24.62%20.29%-14.52%21.45%
FESD.DE
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
3.41%0.21%8.73%4.67%-13.30%6.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FGLR.DE and FESD.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2021

0.27

The correlation between FGLR.DE and FESD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (5 years) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGLR.DE vs. FESD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGLR.DE
FGLR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FGLR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGLR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGLR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FGLR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGLR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FESD.DE
FESD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FESD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FESD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FESD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FESD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FESD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGLR.DE vs. FESD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLR.DE) and Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGLR.DEFESD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.27

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.46

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.73

6.56

+5.17

FGLR.DE vs. FESD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGLR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the FESD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGLR.DE and FESD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGLR.DEFESD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

1.40

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.22

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.19

+0.78

Drawdowns

FGLR.DE vs. FESD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGLR.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.47%, which is greater than FESD.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGLR.DE and FESD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGLR.DEFESD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.47%

-16.01%

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.30%

-3.71%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.47%

-12.34%

-10.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.47%

-16.01%

-6.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.59%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.98%

-7.16%

+3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

1.39%

+0.48%

Volatility

FGLR.DE vs. FESD.DE - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLR.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.51% compared to Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE) at 2.28%. This indicates that FGLR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FESD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGLR.DEFESD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

2.28%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.91%

4.57%

+3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.33%

6.51%

+4.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.21%

8.80%

+5.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.39%

8.70%

+5.69%

FGLR.DE vs. FESD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGLR.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FESD.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGLR.DE vs. FESD.DE - Dividend Comparison

FGLR.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FESD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FESD.DE
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
6.69%5.90%5.86%5.43%4.80%2.01%
FGLR.DE
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGLR.DE and FESD.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FGLR.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FGLR.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FESD.DE.

FGLR.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while FESD.DE is Emerging Markets Bonds. FGLR.DE tracks Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity, while FESD.DE tracks Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FGLR.DE and 0.45% for FESD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGLR.DE and FESD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer