PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGINX vs. BBISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGINX vs. BBISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX) and Sterling Capital Behavioral Large Cap Value Equity Fund (BBISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FGINX having a 20.16% return and BBISX slightly higher at 20.77%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FGINX having a 13.23% annualized return and BBISX not far ahead at 13.26%.


FGINX

1D
0.45%
1M
0.55%
6M
16.50%
YTD
20.16%
1Y
39.51%
3Y*
25.17%
5Y*
17.04%
10Y*
13.23%

BBISX

1D
0.32%
1M
1.86%
6M
16.78%
YTD
20.77%
1Y
33.50%
3Y*
24.47%
5Y*
15.60%
10Y*
13.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGINX vs. BBISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGINX
Delaware Growth and Income Fund
20.16%29.78%15.13%11.98%3.03%21.37%-0.08%25.64%-10.27%18.08%
BBISX
Sterling Capital Behavioral Large Cap Value Equity Fund
20.77%23.54%20.93%12.49%-5.96%31.07%-1.57%23.81%-10.28%18.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FGINX and BBISX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 1996

0.92

The correlation between FGINX and BBISX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGINX vs. BBISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGINX
FGINX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

BBISX
BBISX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
BBISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBISX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BBISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBISX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGINX vs. BBISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX) and Sterling Capital Behavioral Large Cap Value Equity Fund (BBISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGINXBBISXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.53

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.49

5.64

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.74

21.58

-0.84

FGINX vs. BBISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGINX Sharpe Ratio is 3.41, which is comparable to the BBISX Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGINX and BBISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGINX vs. BBISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGINX drawdown since its inception was -54.80%, smaller than the maximum BBISX drawdown of -59.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGINX and BBISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGINXBBISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.80%

-59.31%

+4.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-6.10%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.28%

-14.71%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.21%

-19.45%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.37%

-38.37%

+1.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.67%

-10.12%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.59%

+0.35%

Volatility

FGINX vs. BBISX - Volatility Comparison

Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Sterling Capital Behavioral Large Cap Value Equity Fund (BBISX) at 3.18%. This indicates that FGINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGINXBBISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

3.18%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.80%

8.69%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

11.54%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.89%

15.26%

-0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

17.59%

-0.62%

FGINX vs. BBISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGINX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than BBISX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGINX vs. BBISX - Dividend Comparison

FGINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.25%, more than BBISX's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBISX
Sterling Capital Behavioral Large Cap Value Equity Fund
1.28%1.53%1.88%1.73%1.56%0.43%3.22%8.20%11.93%2.86%1.90%1.68%
FGINX
Delaware Growth and Income Fund
9.25%11.28%12.40%7.11%7.04%11.97%6.59%51.75%25.36%5.13%4.12%5.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FGINX and BBISX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FGINX has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to BBISX (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGINX dropped -54.80% vs BBISX's -59.31%.

FGINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGINX and BBISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer