FGILX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund (FGILX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
FGILX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 2, 2012. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
FGILX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGILX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGILX Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund | -3.26% | 25.99% | 13.80% | 15.33% | -11.93% | 19.05% | 14.49% | 30.20% | -10.93% | 21.68% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGILX achieves a -3.26% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FGILX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 10.82%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
FGILX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -8.66%
- YTD
- -3.26%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 16.18%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.93%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGILX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGILX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGILX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
FGILX
CSUAX
FGILX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund (FGILX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGILX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 1.63 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 2.17 | -0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.32 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 2.36 | -0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.71 | 10.32 | -3.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGILX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 1.63 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.61 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.50 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.55 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGILX and CSUAX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGILX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
FGILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGILX Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund | 2.13% | 2.06% | 2.38% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 11.94% | 3.17% | 1.51% | 6.23% | 2.10% | 1.27% | 2.75% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
FGILX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGILX drawdown since its inception was -30.59%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGILX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGILX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.59% | -52.20% | +21.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.84% | -7.98% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.40% | -20.45% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.59% | -35.05% | +4.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.66% | -4.38% | -4.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.66% | -8.49% | +4.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 1.83% | +0.41% |
Volatility
FGILX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Global Equity Income Fund (FGILX) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that FGILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGILX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 3.26% | +1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.24% | 6.89% | +1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.90% | 11.48% | +3.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.44% | 12.89% | +0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 14.89% | -0.38% |