FGDMX vs. FBMPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class A (FGDMX) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX).
FGDMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 30, 2018. FBMPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 29, 1986.
Performance
FGDMX vs. FBMPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGDMX vs. FBMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGDMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class A | -11.75% | 36.36% | 35.46% | 56.40% | -38.47% | 15.63% | 35.07% | 32.77% | -7.41% |
FBMPX Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio | -11.69% | 37.07% | 35.98% | 56.85% | -38.30% | 15.97% | 35.48% | 33.14% | -7.39% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FGDMX having a -11.75% return and FBMPX slightly higher at -11.69%.
FGDMX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -11.50%
- YTD
- -11.75%
- 6M
- -9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.83%
- 3Y*
- 28.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- —
FBMPX
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -11.49%
- YTD
- -11.69%
- 6M
- -9.17%
- 1Y
- 27.49%
- 3Y*
- 28.69%
- 5Y*
- 11.04%
- 10Y*
- 14.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGDMX vs. FBMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGDMX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FBMPX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGDMX vs. FBMPX — Risk / Return Rank
FGDMX
FBMPX
FGDMX vs. FBMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class A (FGDMX) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGDMX | FBMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 1.20 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 1.77 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 1.39 | -0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.16 | 5.33 | -0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGDMX | FBMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.20 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.48 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.63 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGDMX and FBMPX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGDMX vs. FBMPX - Dividend Comparison
FGDMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%, less than FBMPX's 9.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGDMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class A | 8.67% | 7.66% | 6.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.73% | 3.76% | 35.47% | 8.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FBMPX Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio | 9.16% | 8.09% | 7.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.88% | 3.74% | 35.43% | 15.29% | 5.53% | 7.50% | 7.29% |
Drawdowns
FGDMX vs. FBMPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGDMX drawdown since its inception was -47.60%, smaller than the maximum FBMPX drawdown of -61.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDMX and FBMPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGDMX | FBMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.60% | -61.77% | +14.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.94% | -16.90% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.60% | -47.42% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.94% | -16.90% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.07% | -10.66% | -0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 4.40% | +0.02% |
Volatility
FGDMX vs. FBMPX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class A (FGDMX) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) have volatilities of 7.08% and 7.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGDMX | FBMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.08% | 7.07% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.79% | 13.79% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.04% | 23.07% | -0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.13% | 23.13% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.00% | 21.83% | +2.17% |