FGDL vs. SLVO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FGDL (Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF) and SLVO (UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - FGDL is a Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while SLVO is a Silver fund tracking the Credit Suisse NASDAQ Silver FLOWS 106 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FGDL returned 31.70% vs 62.53% for SLVO. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGDL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SLVO.

Performance

FGDL vs. SLVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) and UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGDL achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than SLVO's 13.49% return.

FGDL

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: -1.94%
• YTD: 2.43%
• 6M: 4.89%
• 1Y: 31.70%
• 3Y*: 31.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLVO

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 4.05%
• YTD: 13.49%
• 6M: 17.86%
• 1Y: 62.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGDL vs. SLVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF	2.43%	64.15%	12.06%
SLVO UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN	13.49%	71.20%	1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FGDL and SLVO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2024	0.68

The correlation between FGDL and SLVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGDL vs. SLVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGDL

FGDL Risk / Return Rank: 31
FGDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
FGDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FGDL Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FGDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FGDL Martin Ratio Rank: 28

SLVO

SLVO Risk / Return Rank: 66
SLVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SLVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SLVO Omega Ratio Rank: 72
SLVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SLVO Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGDL vs. SLVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) and UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGDL	SLVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	2.13	-0.94
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	2.39	-0.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.44	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	3.65	-1.99
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.03	15.01	-10.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGDL vs. SLVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGDL Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the SLVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGDL and SLVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGDL	SLVO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	2.13	-0.94
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.35	1.61	-0.26

Drawdowns

FGDL vs. SLVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGDL drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, which is greater than SLVO's maximum drawdown of -17.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDL and SLVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGDL	SLVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.23%	-17.23%	-2.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.23%	-17.23%	-2.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.16%	-3.22%	-14.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.83%	-3.13%	-0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.88%	4.18%	+3.70%

Volatility

FGDL vs. SLVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) is 5.61%, while UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that FGDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGDL	SLVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.61%	6.39%	-0.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.18%	27.33%	-4.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.78%	29.53%	-2.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.03%	25.23%	-6.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.03%	25.23%	-6.20%

FGDL vs. SLVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGDL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGDL vs. SLVO - Dividend Comparison

FGDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.44%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SLVO UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN	46.44%	19.35%	14.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGDL and SLVO in my portfolio?

FGDL and SLVO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGDL or SLVO?

SLVO has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to FGDL (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGDL dropped -19.23% vs SLVO's -17.23%.

Which ETF is better, FGDL or SLVO?

On 1-year performance, SLVO leads with 62.53% vs 31.70% for FGDL. On fees, FGDL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FGDL has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FGDL or SLVO?

Over the 1-year period, SLVO has performed better with a 62.53% return vs 31.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FGDL or SLVO?

FGDL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SLVO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FGDL or SLVO?

SLVO has the higher dividend yield at 46.44%, compared with 0.00% for FGDL.

What is the main difference between FGDL and SLVO?

FGDL is categorized as Precious Metals, while SLVO is Silver. FGDL tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while SLVO tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ Silver FLOWS 106 Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FGDL and 0.65% for SLVO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.