FGDL vs. FEGIX
FGDL (Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF) and FEGIX (First Eagle Gold Fund Class I) are both Precious Metals funds. Over the past 3 years, FGDL returned 31.32%/yr vs 38.13%/yr for FEGIX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FGDL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for FEGIX.
Performance
FGDL vs. FEGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGDL achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than FEGIX's 4.10% return.
FGDL
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 4.89%
- 1Y
- 31.70%
- 3Y*
- 31.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEGIX
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 11.86%
- 1Y
- 58.98%
- 3Y*
- 38.13%
- 5Y*
- 20.06%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
FGDL vs. FEGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF | 2.43% | 64.15% | 27.31% | 12.92% | 0.91% |
FEGIX First Eagle Gold Fund Class I | 4.10% | 128.89% | 10.57% | 7.24% | 8.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGDL and FEGIX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2022 | 0.81 |
The correlation between FGDL and FEGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGDL vs. FEGIX — Risk / Return Rank
FGDL
FEGIX
FGDL vs. FEGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) and First Eagle Gold Fund Class I (FEGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGDL | FEGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.54 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | 1.90 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.28 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 2.21 | -0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.03 | 5.75 | -1.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGDL | FEGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.54 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.34 | +1.01 |
Drawdowns
FGDL vs. FEGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGDL drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum FEGIX drawdown of -70.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGDL and FEGIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGDL | FEGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.23% | -70.38% | +51.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.23% | -26.66% | +7.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.23% | -26.66% | +7.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.16% | -21.63% | +3.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -28.74% | +24.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.88% | 10.21% | -2.33% |
Volatility
FGDL vs. FEGIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) is 5.61%, while First Eagle Gold Fund Class I (FEGIX) has a volatility of 11.68%. This indicates that FGDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGDL | FEGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 11.68% | -6.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.18% | 32.27% | -9.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.78% | 38.44% | -11.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.03% | 28.77% | -9.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.03% | 27.19% | -8.16% |
FGDL vs. FEGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGDL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FEGIX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGDL vs. FEGIX - Dividend Comparison
FGDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEGIX First Eagle Gold Fund Class I | 1.15% | 1.19% | 5.31% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 0.09% |
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGDL and FEGIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEGIX has higher volatility (11.68%) compared to FGDL (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGDL dropped -19.23% vs FEGIX's -70.38%.
FEGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGDL and FEGIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer