PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGCSX vs. VBISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGCSX vs. VBISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Short-Interm Total Ret Bd Fd (FGCSX) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund (VBISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGCSX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly higher than VBISX's 0.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FGCSX having a 1.86% annualized return and VBISX not far behind at 1.79%.


FGCSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.74%
1Y
3.67%
3Y*
4.13%
5Y*
1.39%
10Y*
1.86%

VBISX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.50%
1Y
3.64%
3Y*
4.14%
5Y*
1.44%
10Y*
1.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGCSX vs. VBISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGCSX
Federated Hermes Short-Interm Total Ret Bd Fd
0.32%5.72%3.28%4.56%-5.92%-0.76%4.72%4.94%0.48%1.55%
VBISX
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund
0.26%5.67%3.66%4.54%-5.61%-1.35%4.63%4.78%1.27%1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FGCSX and VBISX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2005

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between FGCSX and VBISX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGCSX vs. VBISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGCSX
FGCSX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FGCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FGCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VBISX
VBISX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VBISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBISX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VBISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBISX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGCSX vs. VBISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Short-Interm Total Ret Bd Fd (FGCSX) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund (VBISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGCSXVBISXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

1.64

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

2.75

+0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.33

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

2.37

+0.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.75

7.61

+2.14

FGCSX vs. VBISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the VBISX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGCSX and VBISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGCSXVBISXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.64

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.49

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.75

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

1.34

-0.35

Drawdowns

FGCSX vs. VBISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGCSX drawdown since its inception was -8.80%, roughly equal to the maximum VBISX drawdown of -8.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGCSX and VBISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGCSXVBISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

-8.79%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.27%

-1.54%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.54%

-1.55%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.80%

-8.72%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.80%

-8.79%

-0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.66%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.14%

-0.87%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

0.48%

-0.10%

Volatility

FGCSX vs. VBISX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Short-Interm Total Ret Bd Fd (FGCSX) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund (VBISX) have volatilities of 0.68% and 0.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGCSXVBISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

0.69%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.46%

1.59%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10%

2.24%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.83%

2.94%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.29%

2.38%

-0.09%

FGCSX vs. VBISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGCSX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than VBISX's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGCSX vs. VBISX - Dividend Comparison

FGCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than VBISX's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGCSX
Federated Hermes Short-Interm Total Ret Bd Fd
3.82%3.85%3.03%2.21%1.19%1.03%1.28%2.07%2.05%1.74%2.04%2.36%
VBISX
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund
3.90%3.44%3.29%2.10%1.38%1.16%1.72%2.16%1.92%1.58%1.42%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGCSX and VBISX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBISX has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to FGCSX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGCSX dropped -8.80% vs VBISX's -8.79%.

FGCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGCSX and VBISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer