FGCSX vs. BATAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FGCSX (Federated Hermes Short-Interm Total Ret Bd Fd) and BATAX (BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, FGCSX returned 1.80%/yr vs 3.61%/yr for BATAX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGCSX charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for BATAX.

Performance

FGCSX vs. BATAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Short-Interm Total Ret Bd Fd (FGCSX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGCSX achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than BATAX's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, FGCSX has underperformed BATAX with an annualized return of 1.80%, while BATAX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.61% annualized return.

FGCSX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 0.02%
• 6M: 0.44%
• 1Y: 3.05%
• 3Y*: 4.06%
• 5Y*: 1.36%
• 10Y*: 1.80%

BATAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: 1.87%
• 6M: 2.42%
• 1Y: 6.01%
• 3Y*: 6.66%
• 5Y*: 3.37%
• 10Y*: 3.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGCSX vs. BATAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGCSX Federated Hermes Short-Interm Total Ret Bd Fd	0.02%	5.72%	3.28%	4.56%	-5.92%	-0.76%	4.72%	4.94%	0.48%	1.55%
BATAX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio	1.87%	7.37%	7.34%	6.43%	-5.87%	1.72%	2.75%	6.76%	2.20%	5.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FGCSX and BATAX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between FGCSX and BATAX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FGCSX vs. BATAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGCSX

FGCSX Risk / Return Rank: 43
FGCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FGCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FGCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FGCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FGCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

BATAX

BATAX Risk / Return Rank: 97
BATAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
BATAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BATAX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BATAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
BATAX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGCSX vs. BATAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Short-Interm Total Ret Bd Fd (FGCSX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGCSX	BATAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	3.00	-1.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	7.45	-4.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	2.12	-0.78
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	6.57	-4.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.29	27.52	-19.22

FGCSX vs. BATAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the BATAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGCSX and BATAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGCSX vs. BATAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGCSX drawdown since its inception was -8.80%, smaller than the maximum BATAX drawdown of -17.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGCSX and BATAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGCSX	BATAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.80%	-17.42%	+8.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.27%	-0.94%	-0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.54%	-1.15%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.80%	-8.12%	-0.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-8.80%	-17.42%	+8.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-0.10%	-0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.14%	-1.30%	+0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.39%	0.22%	+0.17%

Volatility

FGCSX vs. BATAX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Short-Interm Total Ret Bd Fd (FGCSX) has a higher volatility of 0.74% compared to BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX) at 0.66%. This indicates that FGCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGCSX	BATAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.74%	0.66%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.54%	1.45%	+0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11%	2.05%	+0.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.84%	2.18%	+0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.30%	3.07%	-0.77%

FGCSX vs. BATAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGCSX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than BATAX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGCSX vs. BATAX - Dividend Comparison

FGCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than BATAX's 5.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BATAX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio	5.74%	5.92%	5.45%	3.91%	3.14%	1.82%	3.22%	4.73%	5.36%	4.10%	0.40%	0.00%
FGCSX Federated Hermes Short-Interm Total Ret Bd Fd	3.84%	3.85%	3.03%	2.21%	1.19%	1.03%	1.28%	2.07%	2.05%	1.74%	2.04%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGCSX and BATAX in my portfolio?

FGCSX and BATAX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGCSX or BATAX?

FGCSX has higher volatility (0.74%) compared to BATAX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGCSX dropped -8.80% vs BATAX's -17.42%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BATAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.