PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGCKX vs. GXXIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGCKX vs. GXXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGCKX achieves a 23.78% return, which is significantly higher than GXXIX's 6.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FGCKX has outperformed GXXIX with an annualized return of 23.10%, while GXXIX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.74% annualized return.


FGCKX

1D
0.05%
1M
8.79%
YTD
23.78%
6M
20.00%
1Y
48.64%
3Y*
31.78%
5Y*
17.62%
10Y*
23.10%

GXXIX

1D
0.82%
1M
4.39%
YTD
6.73%
6M
5.69%
1Y
12.71%
3Y*
9.59%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
14.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGCKX vs. GXXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGCKX
Fidelity Growth Company K
23.78%18.67%37.30%47.35%-33.82%22.62%67.61%38.50%-4.07%36.89%
GXXIX
abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund
6.73%3.82%10.11%15.19%-26.55%81.37%29.56%36.96%-6.73%20.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FGCKX and GXXIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2011

0.84

The correlation between FGCKX and GXXIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGCKX vs. GXXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGCKX
FGCKX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FGCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FGCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

GXXIX
GXXIX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
GXXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
GXXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGCKX vs. GXXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGCKXGXXIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.20

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

1.13

+2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.19

4.36

+10.83

FGCKX vs. GXXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGCKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the GXXIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGCKX and GXXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGCKXGXXIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

1.12

+1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.43

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

0.62

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.65

+0.07

Drawdowns

FGCKX vs. GXXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGCKX drawdown since its inception was -51.01%, which is greater than GXXIX's maximum drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGCKX and GXXIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGCKXGXXIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.01%

-33.65%

-17.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.55%

-11.78%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.20%

-19.74%

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.21%

-33.65%

-6.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.21%

-33.65%

-6.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.96%

-6.16%

-2.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

3.06%

+0.26%

Volatility

FGCKX vs. GXXIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX) at 2.93%. This indicates that FGCKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GXXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGCKXGXXIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

2.93%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.40%

9.35%

+5.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.43%

11.90%

+6.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.02%

27.77%

-3.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.43%

23.72%

-0.29%

FGCKX vs. GXXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGCKX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GXXIX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGCKX vs. GXXIX - Dividend Comparison

FGCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGCKX
Fidelity Growth Company K
0.00%0.00%8.80%3.81%7.16%10.63%8.83%3.84%6.38%4.73%6.20%3.96%
GXXIX
abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund
2.15%2.30%0.00%0.28%0.39%59.39%14.10%9.76%12.93%10.11%12.20%5.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGCKX and GXXIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGCKX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to GXXIX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGCKX dropped -51.01% vs GXXIX's -33.65%.

FGCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGCKX and GXXIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer