PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGCKX vs. FOCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGCKX vs. FOCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGCKX achieves a 23.78% return, which is significantly lower than FOCKX's 27.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FGCKX having a 23.10% annualized return and FOCKX not far behind at 22.74%.


FGCKX

1D
0.05%
1M
8.79%
YTD
23.78%
6M
20.00%
1Y
48.64%
3Y*
31.78%
5Y*
17.62%
10Y*
23.10%

FOCKX

1D
0.76%
1M
10.65%
YTD
27.65%
6M
28.76%
1Y
62.04%
3Y*
34.92%
5Y*
19.63%
10Y*
22.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGCKX vs. FOCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGCKX
Fidelity Growth Company K
23.78%18.67%37.30%47.35%-33.82%22.62%67.61%38.50%-4.07%36.89%
FOCKX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K
27.65%22.28%38.91%42.92%-32.07%25.06%46.83%39.36%-3.18%38.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FGCKX and FOCKX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2008

0.96

The correlation between FGCKX and FOCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGCKX vs. FOCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGCKX
FGCKX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FGCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FGCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FOCKX
FOCKX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FOCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGCKX vs. FOCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGCKXFOCKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.59

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

5.61

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.19

24.83

-9.64

FGCKX vs. FOCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGCKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the FOCKX Sharpe Ratio of 3.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGCKX and FOCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGCKXFOCKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

3.56

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.87

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

1.02

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.74

-0.02

Drawdowns

FGCKX vs. FOCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGCKX drawdown since its inception was -51.01%, roughly equal to the maximum FOCKX drawdown of -53.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGCKX and FOCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGCKXFOCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.01%

-53.33%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.55%

-11.28%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.20%

-24.83%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.21%

-36.97%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.21%

-36.97%

-3.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.96%

-8.38%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

2.54%

+0.78%

Volatility

FGCKX vs. FOCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX) is 4.39%, while Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that FGCKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGCKXFOCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

5.39%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.40%

13.94%

+0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.43%

17.79%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.02%

22.68%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.43%

22.46%

+0.97%

FGCKX vs. FOCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGCKX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FOCKX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGCKX vs. FOCKX - Dividend Comparison

FGCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FOCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGCKX
Fidelity Growth Company K
0.00%0.00%8.80%3.81%7.16%10.63%8.83%3.84%6.38%4.73%6.20%3.96%
FOCKX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K
5.92%7.56%16.42%0.09%3.97%11.34%6.18%7.49%7.81%4.85%3.25%5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FGCKX and FOCKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FOCKX has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to FGCKX (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGCKX dropped -51.01% vs FOCKX's -53.33%.

FOCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.56 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGCKX and FOCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer