FGBMX vs. GMOQX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FGBMX (Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class Z) and GMOQX (GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, FGBMX returned 10.70%/yr vs 17.18%/yr for GMOQX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FGBMX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GMOQX.

Performance

FGBMX vs. GMOQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class Z (FGBMX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGBMX achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly lower than GMOQX's 8.19% return.

FGBMX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -1.57%
• 6M: 1.11%
• YTD: 2.62%
• 1Y: 10.21%
• 3Y*: 10.70%
• 5Y*: 3.50%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.18%

GMOQX

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -1.02%
• 6M: 4.16%
• YTD: 8.19%
• 1Y: 19.82%
• 3Y*: 17.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FGBMX Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class Z	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
GMOQX GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FGBMX vs. GMOQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FGBMX Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class Z	2.62%	14.93%	6.88%	14.10%	-16.03%	-1.55%
GMOQX GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI	8.19%	22.45%	12.60%	17.76%	-16.26%	-2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FGBMX and GMOQX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2021	0.89

The correlation between FGBMX and GMOQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGBMX vs. GMOQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGBMX

FGBMX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FGBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FGBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FGBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FGBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FGBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

GMOQX

GMOQX Risk / Return Rank: 98
GMOQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
GMOQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
GMOQX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
GMOQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
GMOQX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGBMX vs. GMOQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class Z (FGBMX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGBMX	GMOQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	3.76	-1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.03	6.64	-2.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.88	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	5.22	-2.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.71	21.93	-10.22

FGBMX vs. GMOQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGBMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is lower than the GMOQX Sharpe Ratio of 3.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGBMX and GMOQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGBMX vs. GMOQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGBMX drawdown since its inception was -27.12%, smaller than the maximum GMOQX drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGBMX and GMOQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGBMX	GMOQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.12%	-31.41%	+4.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.85%	-3.82%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.87%	-9.02%	+3.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.81%	-1.42%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.02%	-9.41%	+3.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	0.91%	+0.01%

Volatility

FGBMX vs. GMOQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class Z (FGBMX) is 0.86%, while GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX) has a volatility of 0.99%. This indicates that FGBMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMOQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGBMX	GMOQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.86%	0.99%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.56%	4.00%	-0.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.41%	5.31%	-0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.63%	10.72%	-4.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.23%	10.72%	-3.49%

FGBMX vs. GMOQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGBMX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than GMOQX's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGBMX vs. GMOQX - Dividend Comparison

FGBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than GMOQX's 4.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FGBMX Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class Z	4.65%	5.13%	4.79%	5.24%	4.00%	3.55%	4.14%	4.62%	0.43%
GMOQX GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI	4.57%	6.37%	6.23%	10.36%	13.87%	7.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGBMX and GMOQX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, FGBMX and GMOQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FGBMX or GMOQX?

GMOQX has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to FGBMX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGBMX dropped -27.12% vs GMOQX's -31.41%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMOQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.