FFUT vs. WTMF
FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) and WTMF (WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund) are both Systematic Trend funds. FFUT is actively managed, while WTMF is passively managed. Over the past year, FFUT returned 22.59% vs 18.92% for WTMF. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FFUT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for WTMF.
Performance
FFUT vs. WTMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFUT achieves a 12.52% return, which is significantly higher than WTMF's 8.23% return.
FFUT
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- YTD
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 22.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.82%
WTMF
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 8.23%
- 1Y
- 18.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.87M | $4.04M | $2.05M | |
| $964.56K | $1.15M | $1.10M |
FFUT vs. WTMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF | 12.52% | 8.58% |
WTMF WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 8.23% | 12.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFUT and WTMF is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFUT vs. WTMF — Risk / Return Rank
FFUT
WTMF
FFUT vs. WTMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFUT | WTMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.40 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.06 | 4.71 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.81 | 18.11 | -4.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFUT vs. WTMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFUT drawdown since its inception was -5.59%, smaller than the maximum WTMF drawdown of -30.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFUT and WTMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFUT | WTMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.59% | -30.79% | +25.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.59% | -4.04% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -0.75% | -1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | -17.53% | +16.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 1.05% | +0.59% |
Volatility
FFUT vs. WTMF - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) has a higher volatility of 3.71% compared to WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) at 2.17%. This indicates that FFUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFUT | WTMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 2.17% | +1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.26% | 6.59% | +2.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.66% | 9.09% | +2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 9.37% | +1.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 8.13% | +2.98% |
FFUT vs. WTMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFUT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than WTMF's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFUT vs. WTMF - Dividend Comparison
FFUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than WTMF's 2.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF | 1.86% | 2.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WTMF WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 2.81% | 3.04% | 3.57% | 4.74% | 5.29% | 14.71% | 0.47% | 1.63% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFUT and WTMF have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFUT has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to WTMF (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFUT dropped -5.59% vs WTMF's -30.79%.
On 1-year performance, FFUT leads with 22.59% vs 18.92% for WTMF. On fees, WTMF is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, WTMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FFUT has performed better with a 22.59% return vs 18.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WTMF is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.
WTMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 1.86% for FFUT.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFUT and 0.65% for WTMF.
WTMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFUT and WTMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer