FFUT vs. ETHE.SW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (ETHE.SW).

FFUT and ETHE.SW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FFUT is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 3, 2025. ETHE.SW is an actively managed fund by CoinShares. It was launched on Feb 23, 2021.

Performance

FFUT vs. ETHE.SW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (ETHE.SW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FFUT vs. ETHE.SW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	7.42%	8.26%
ETHE.SW CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH)	-31.28%	15.65%

Different Trading Currencies

FFUT is traded in USD, while ETHE.SW is traded in CHF. To make them comparable, the ETHE.SW values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFUT achieves a 7.42% return, which is significantly higher than ETHE.SW's -31.28% return.

FFUT

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 2.31%
• YTD: 7.42%
• 6M: 11.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ETHE.SW

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 5.81%
• YTD: -31.28%
• 6M: -50.10%
• 1Y: 15.31%
• 3Y*: 5.45%
• 5Y*: 2.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFUT vs. ETHE.SW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFUT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHE.SW's 0.00% expense ratio.

FFUT

Fidelity Managed Futures ETF

ETHE.SW

CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH)

Return for Risk

FFUT vs. ETHE.SW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHE.SW

ETHE.SW Risk / Return Rank: 18
ETHE.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
ETHE.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
ETHE.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 24
ETHE.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
ETHE.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFUT vs. ETHE.SW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (ETHE.SW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFUT	ETHE.SW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.86	0.07	+1.79

Correlation

The correlation between FFUT and ETHE.SW is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FFUT vs. ETHE.SW - Dividend Comparison

FFUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, while ETHE.SW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	1.95%	2.09%
ETHE.SW CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH)	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FFUT vs. ETHE.SW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFUT drawdown since its inception was -2.84%, smaller than the maximum ETHE.SW drawdown of -79.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFUT and ETHE.SW.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFUT	ETHE.SW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.84%	-77.57%	+74.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-61.87%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-77.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.59%	-62.57%	+60.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.89%	-42.54%	+41.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	29.52%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FFUT	ETHE.SW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	45.67%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	65.41%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.01%	85.09%	-74.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.01%	88.41%	-77.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.01%	88.43%	-77.42%