PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFTWX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFTWX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2025 Fund (FFTWX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FFTWX having a 8.11% return and FCNTX slightly lower at 7.76%. Over the past 10 years, FFTWX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 8.29%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.


FFTWX

1D
0.38%
1M
3.06%
YTD
8.11%
6M
8.93%
1Y
19.54%
3Y*
13.29%
5Y*
5.88%
10Y*
8.29%

FCNTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.65%
YTD
7.76%
6M
10.05%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
17.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFTWX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFTWX
Fidelity Freedom 2025 Fund
8.11%16.46%8.20%14.10%-16.66%10.09%14.70%19.45%-5.93%15.57%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
7.76%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FFTWX and FCNTX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2003

0.87

The correlation between FFTWX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFTWX vs. FCNTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FFTWX
FCNTX

Technology

23.0%
27.0%

Financial Services

17.1%
13.8%

Industrials

15.5%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.7%
9.2%

Communication Services

7.7%
21.2%

Basic Materials

5.8%
2.1%

Energy

5.7%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
3.7%

Utilities

1.8%
0.5%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.1%

Technology

FFTWX
23.0%
FCNTX
27.0%

Financial Services

FFTWX
17.1%
FCNTX
13.8%

Industrials

FFTWX
15.5%
FCNTX
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FFTWX
9.2%
FCNTX
10.1%

Healthcare

FFTWX
8.7%
FCNTX
9.2%

Communication Services

FFTWX
7.7%
FCNTX
21.2%

Basic Materials

FFTWX
5.8%
FCNTX
2.1%

Energy

FFTWX
5.7%
FCNTX
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

FFTWX
4.5%
FCNTX
3.7%

Utilities

FFTWX
1.8%
FCNTX
0.5%

Real Estate

FFTWX
1.1%
FCNTX
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFTWX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFTWX
FFTWX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FFTWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTWX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFTWX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2025 Fund (FFTWX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFTWXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.31

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.13

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.46

9.04

+4.42

FFTWX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFTWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFTWX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFTWXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

1.72

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.79

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.89

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.78

-0.25

Drawdowns

FFTWX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFTWX drawdown since its inception was -47.51%, roughly equal to the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTWX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFTWXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.51%

-49.19%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.40%

-11.30%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.87%

-19.75%

+10.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.66%

-32.59%

+8.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.66%

-32.59%

+8.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.53%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-8.16%

+2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

2.65%

-1.19%

Volatility

FFTWX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom 2025 Fund (FFTWX) is 2.96%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that FFTWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFTWXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

3.26%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.68%

10.48%

-3.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.02%

14.03%

-6.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.94%

19.15%

-9.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.09%

19.68%

-9.59%

FFTWX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFTWX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFTWX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FFTWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.77%, more than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.33%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FFTWX
Fidelity Freedom 2025 Fund
6.77%6.44%3.74%2.08%9.66%10.38%5.75%6.09%6.39%3.04%3.91%5.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFTWX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCNTX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to FFTWX (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFTWX dropped -47.51% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FFTWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFTWX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer