FFTHX vs. WASMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFTHX (Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund) and WASMX (Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap Fund) are both mutual funds - FFTHX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Fidelity, while WASMX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Boston Trust Walden. Over the past 10 years, FFTHX returned 10.69%/yr vs 9.85%/yr for WASMX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FFTHX charges 0.71%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for WASMX.

Performance

FFTHX vs. WASMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund (FFTHX) and Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap Fund (WASMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFTHX achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly higher than WASMX's 1.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FFTHX has outperformed WASMX with an annualized return of 10.69%, while WASMX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.85% annualized return.

FFTHX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 3.80%
• YTD: 10.11%
• 6M: 11.29%
• 1Y: 23.66%
• 3Y*: 16.40%
• 5Y*: 7.85%
• 10Y*: 10.69%

WASMX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 2.50%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 6M: 1.02%
• 1Y: 3.87%
• 3Y*: 8.69%
• 5Y*: 4.59%
• 10Y*: 9.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFTHX vs. WASMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFTHX Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund	10.11%	19.16%	11.03%	17.67%	-17.67%	14.44%	17.14%	24.49%	-8.40%	20.73%
WASMX Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap Fund	1.19%	0.31%	10.39%	16.40%	-14.57%	30.04%	9.22%	32.50%	-5.60%	14.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FFTHX and WASMX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012	0.84

The correlation between FFTHX and WASMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FFTHX vs. WASMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFTHX

FFTHX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FFTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FFTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FFTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FFTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FFTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

WASMX

WASMX Risk / Return Rank: 5
WASMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
WASMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
WASMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
WASMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
WASMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFTHX vs. WASMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund (FFTHX) and Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap Fund (WASMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFTHX	WASMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	0.35	+2.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	0.64	+2.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.07	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	0.42	+2.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.93	1.18	+12.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFTHX vs. WASMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFTHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the WASMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFTHX and WASMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFTHX	WASMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	0.35	+2.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.27	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	0.53	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.59	-0.09

Drawdowns

FFTHX vs. WASMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFTHX drawdown since its inception was -52.86%, which is greater than WASMX's maximum drawdown of -37.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTHX and WASMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFTHX	WASMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.86%	-37.74%	-15.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.52%	-11.38%	+3.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.60%	-20.52%	+8.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.94%	-23.07%	-2.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.81%	-37.74%	+8.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.38%	+6.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.95%	-5.22%	-1.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.72%	4.06%	-2.34%

Volatility

FFTHX vs. WASMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund (FFTHX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap Fund (WASMX) at 3.04%. This indicates that FFTHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WASMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFTHX	WASMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.40%	3.04%	+0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.99%	9.14%	-1.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.68%	13.57%	-3.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.40%	17.16%	-4.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.52%	18.61%	-5.09%

FFTHX vs. WASMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFTHX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than WASMX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFTHX vs. WASMX - Dividend Comparison

FFTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, more than WASMX's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFTHX Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund	5.85%	5.03%	2.75%	1.86%	11.21%	11.62%	5.93%	6.75%	7.66%	3.17%	4.00%	5.97%
WASMX Boston Trust Walden SMID Cap Fund	1.63%	1.65%	1.67%	0.52%	4.90%	4.75%	1.86%	9.96%	4.40%	0.52%	5.41%	7.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFTHX and WASMX in my portfolio?

FFTHX and WASMX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFTHX or WASMX?

FFTHX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to WASMX (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFTHX dropped -52.86% vs WASMX's -37.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.