PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFSFX vs. FFFZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFSFX vs. FFFZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class A (FFFZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFSFX achieves a 13.84% return, which is significantly higher than FFFZX's 12.13% return.


FFSFX

1D
0.58%
1M
5.11%
YTD
13.84%
6M
15.69%
1Y
31.32%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*

FFFZX

1D
0.49%
1M
4.55%
YTD
12.13%
6M
13.75%
1Y
27.82%
3Y*
19.47%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
11.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFSFX vs. FFFZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FFSFX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund
13.84%23.76%14.01%20.54%-18.28%16.54%18.08%9.00%
FFFZX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class A
12.13%22.79%13.31%18.99%-18.35%15.72%17.26%8.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FFSFX and FFFZX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.99

The correlation between FFSFX and FFFZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFSFX vs. FFFZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFSFX
FFSFX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FFSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FFFZX
FFFZX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FFFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFSFX vs. FFFZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class A (FFFZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFSFXFFFZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.42

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.92

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.44

12.75

+1.69

FFSFX vs. FFFZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFSFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the FFFZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFSFX and FFFZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFSFXFFFZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.25

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.64

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.45

+0.33

Drawdowns

FFSFX vs. FFFZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFSFX drawdown since its inception was -31.03%, smaller than the maximum FFFZX drawdown of -56.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSFX and FFFZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFSFXFFFZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.03%

-56.70%

+25.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-9.63%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.43%

-15.14%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.31%

-27.52%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-8.78%

+2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.20%

-0.01%

Volatility

FFSFX vs. FFFZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class A (FFFZX) have volatilities of 4.28% and 4.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFSFXFFFZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

4.17%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.56%

10.31%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.79%

12.52%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.03%

14.90%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

15.49%

+1.55%

FFSFX vs. FFFZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFSFX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFZX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFSFX vs. FFFZX - Dividend Comparison

FFSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, less than FFFZX's 7.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFZX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2045 Fund Class A
7.04%6.25%1.44%1.34%10.74%9.51%5.21%6.78%11.61%3.53%4.64%3.73%
FFSFX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund
4.91%3.69%2.29%2.01%8.77%7.81%2.25%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FFSFX and FFFZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFSFX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to FFFZX (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFSFX dropped -31.03% vs FFFZX's -56.70%.

FFSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFSFX and FFFZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer