FFSFX vs. FDFPX
FFSFX (Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund) and FDFPX (Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FFSFX returned 10.42%/yr vs 11.28%/yr for FDFPX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FFSFX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FDFPX.
Performance
FFSFX vs. FDFPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FFSFX having a 13.84% return and FDFPX slightly higher at 14.11%.
FFSFX
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- 13.84%
- 6M
- 15.69%
- 1Y
- 31.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.42%
- 10Y*
- —
FDFPX
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- 14.11%
- 6M
- 15.71%
- 1Y
- 31.31%
- 3Y*
- 21.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- —
FFSFX vs. FDFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFSFX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund | 13.84% | 23.76% | 14.01% | 20.54% | -18.28% | 16.54% | 18.08% | 9.00% |
FDFPX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund | 14.11% | 22.81% | 17.81% | 20.93% | -18.57% | 16.84% | 18.54% | 9.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFSFX and FDFPX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019 | 0.99 |
The correlation between FFSFX and FDFPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFSFX vs. FDFPX — Risk / Return Rank
FFSFX
FDFPX
FFSFX vs. FDFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFSFX | FDFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.47 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 3.33 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.44 | 14.77 | -0.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFSFX | FDFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 2.53 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.75 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.81 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
FFSFX vs. FDFPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFSFX drawdown since its inception was -31.03%, roughly equal to the maximum FDFPX drawdown of -31.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSFX and FDFPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFSFX | FDFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.03% | -31.22% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.79% | -9.54% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.43% | -15.42% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.31% | -27.41% | +0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -5.85% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 2.15% | +0.04% |
Volatility
FFSFX vs. FDFPX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund (FFSFX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX) have volatilities of 4.28% and 4.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFSFX | FDFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | 4.15% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.56% | 10.33% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.79% | 12.56% | +0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 15.09% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 17.18% | -0.14% |
FFSFX vs. FDFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFSFX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFPX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFSFX vs. FDFPX - Dividend Comparison
FFSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than FDFPX's 3.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDFPX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund | 3.75% | 2.87% | 6.56% | 2.22% | 5.41% | 8.52% | 5.38% | 3.19% |
FFSFX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund | 4.91% | 3.69% | 2.29% | 2.01% | 8.77% | 7.81% | 2.25% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, FFSFX and FDFPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FFSFX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to FDFPX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFSFX dropped -31.03% vs FDFPX's -31.22%.
FDFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFSFX and FDFPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer