FFRSX vs. QILGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund (FFRSX) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX).
FFRSX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Dec 2, 2010. QILGX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Sep 15, 2005.
Performance
FFRSX vs. QILGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFRSX vs. QILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFRSX Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund | -0.72% | 5.61% | 6.71% | 8.04% | -5.85% | 3.73% | 0.45% | 6.71% | 0.38% | 3.54% |
QILGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund | -9.18% | 19.46% | 40.83% | 39.63% | -24.86% | 30.46% | 38.39% | 32.01% | 1.52% | 25.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFRSX achieves a -0.72% return, which is significantly higher than QILGX's -9.18% return. Over the past 10 years, FFRSX has underperformed QILGX with an annualized return of 3.41%, while QILGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.94% annualized return.
FFRSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- -0.72%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 5.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.15%
- 10Y*
- 3.41%
QILGX
- 1D
- 3.69%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -9.18%
- 6M
- -6.82%
- 1Y
- 18.03%
- 3Y*
- 23.36%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- 17.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFRSX vs. QILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFRSX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than QILGX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFRSX vs. QILGX — Risk / Return Rank
FFRSX
QILGX
FFRSX vs. QILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund (FFRSX) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFRSX | QILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.64 | 0.91 | +0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.82 | 1.37 | +1.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.22 | +0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 1.16 | +1.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.11 | 3.79 | +7.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFRSX | QILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 0.91 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.31 | 0.73 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.06 | 0.85 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.56 | +0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFRSX and QILGX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FFRSX vs. QILGX - Dividend Comparison
FFRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, more than QILGX's 3.41% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFRSX Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund | 5.61% | 6.38% | 6.95% | 6.88% | 4.15% | 2.92% | 3.37% | 4.62% | 4.41% | 3.68% | 3.76% | 3.71% |
QILGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund | 3.41% | 3.09% | 6.60% | 1.47% | 13.57% | 19.44% | 7.47% | 5.07% | 10.33% | 7.40% | 0.55% | 11.76% |
Drawdowns
FFRSX vs. QILGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFRSX drawdown since its inception was -17.13%, smaller than the maximum QILGX drawdown of -53.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFRSX and QILGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFRSX | QILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.13% | -53.48% | +36.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.28% | -15.55% | +14.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.54% | -30.05% | +22.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.13% | -31.68% | +14.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -12.44% | +11.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -9.01% | +8.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.39% | 4.75% | -4.36% |
Volatility
FFRSX vs. QILGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes Floating Rate Strat Inc Fund (FFRSX) is 0.58%, while Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that FFRSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFRSX | QILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.58% | 6.81% | -6.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.62% | 13.44% | -11.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45% | 19.96% | -17.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.42% | 21.04% | -18.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.24% | 21.22% | -17.98% |