FFOPX vs. TRRMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (TRRMX).
FFOPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2009. TRRMX is an actively managed fund by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 29, 2006.
Performance
FFOPX vs. TRRMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFOPX vs. TRRMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFOPX Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class | -1.52% | 21.41% | 14.20% | 19.97% | -18.20% | 15.98% | 16.55% | 26.00% | -7.19% | 20.61% |
TRRMX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund | -1.02% | 14.26% | 14.19% | 20.85% | -19.09% | 17.51% | 18.67% | 25.35% | -7.66% | 20.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFOPX achieves a -1.52% return, which is significantly lower than TRRMX's -1.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FFOPX has outperformed TRRMX with an annualized return of 10.73%, while TRRMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.08% annualized return.
FFOPX
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- -1.52%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 19.25%
- 3Y*
- 15.27%
- 5Y*
- 8.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
TRRMX
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- -6.46%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- -2.37%
- 1Y
- 12.62%
- 3Y*
- 13.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.68%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFOPX vs. TRRMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFOPX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TRRMX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFOPX vs. TRRMX — Risk / Return Rank
FFOPX
TRRMX
FFOPX vs. TRRMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (TRRMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFOPX | TRRMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 0.80 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | 1.22 | +0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.18 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 0.87 | +0.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.34 | 3.87 | +4.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFOPX | TRRMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 0.80 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.45 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.66 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.43 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFOPX and TRRMX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FFOPX vs. TRRMX - Dividend Comparison
FFOPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, while TRRMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFOPX Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class | 2.04% | 2.01% | 2.04% | 1.98% | 2.07% | 2.05% | 1.97% | 15.21% | 2.32% | 2.09% | 2.14% | 2.01% |
TRRMX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.88% | 4.45% | 7.81% | 6.91% | 4.33% | 5.75% | 8.56% | 2.32% | 3.08% | 3.96% |
Drawdowns
FFOPX vs. TRRMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFOPX drawdown since its inception was -30.71%, smaller than the maximum TRRMX drawdown of -53.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFOPX and TRRMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFOPX | TRRMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.71% | -53.59% | +22.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.81% | -11.66% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.18% | -27.95% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.71% | -32.51% | +1.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.51% | -7.23% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.73% | -7.63% | +2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 2.94% | -0.57% |
Volatility
FFOPX vs. TRRMX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (TRRMX) have volatilities of 5.84% and 6.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFOPX | TRRMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 6.00% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | 9.90% | -0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.37% | 16.55% | -1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 15.17% | -0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.11% | 15.45% | -0.34% |