PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFOPX vs. FQLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFOPX vs. FQLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFOPX achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly lower than FQLSX's 13.40% return.


FFOPX

1D
-0.78%
1M
3.77%
YTD
11.59%
6M
12.24%
1Y
27.14%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
9.77%
10Y*
11.87%

FQLSX

1D
-0.59%
1M
3.74%
YTD
13.40%
6M
14.76%
1Y
29.91%
3Y*
21.76%
5Y*
11.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFOPX vs. FQLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFOPX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class
11.59%21.41%14.20%19.97%-18.20%15.98%16.55%26.00%-7.19%10.11%
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
13.40%22.80%18.08%21.04%-18.58%16.89%18.43%25.96%-8.31%10.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FFOPX and FQLSX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.99

The correlation between FFOPX and FQLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFOPX vs. FQLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFOPX
FFOPX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FFOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FFOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FQLSX
FQLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FQLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FQLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFOPX vs. FQLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFOPXFQLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.25

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.60

14.35

-0.75

FFOPX vs. FQLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFOPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the FQLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFOPX and FQLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFOPXFQLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.45

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.73

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.77

-0.06

Drawdowns

FFOPX vs. FQLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFOPX drawdown since its inception was -30.71%, roughly equal to the maximum FQLSX drawdown of -31.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFOPX and FQLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFOPXFQLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.71%

-31.26%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-9.48%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.72%

-15.37%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-27.41%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-0.59%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.67%

-5.43%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

2.14%

-0.11%

Volatility

FFOPX vs. FQLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) is 3.58%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that FFOPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFOPXFQLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

4.15%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.33%

10.31%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.57%

12.55%

-0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

15.12%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

16.08%

-0.92%

FFOPX vs. FQLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFOPX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FQLSX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FFOPX vs. FQLSX - Dividend Comparison

FFOPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than FQLSX's 4.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFOPX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class
1.79%2.01%2.04%1.98%2.07%2.05%1.97%15.21%2.32%2.09%2.14%2.01%
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
4.61%3.32%7.20%2.08%5.79%8.05%5.76%7.02%8.18%3.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FFOPX and FQLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FQLSX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to FFOPX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFOPX dropped -30.71% vs FQLSX's -31.26%.

FQLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFOPX and FQLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer