PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFOPX vs. FIKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFOPX vs. FIKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Retirement Fund Investor Class (FIKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFOPX achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly higher than FIKFX's 3.28% return. Over the past 10 years, FFOPX has outperformed FIKFX with an annualized return of 11.40%, while FIKFX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.02% annualized return.


FFOPX

1D
1.95%
1M
-0.50%
6M
7.18%
YTD
10.27%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
11.40%
ALL TIME*
10.48%

FIKFX

1D
0.56%
1M
-0.35%
6M
2.29%
YTD
3.28%
1Y
7.10%
3Y*
6.88%
5Y*
2.72%
10Y*
4.02%
ALL TIME*
3.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FFOPX vs. FIKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFOPX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class
10.27%21.41%14.20%19.97%-18.20%15.98%16.55%26.00%-7.19%20.61%
FIKFX
Fidelity Freedom Index Retirement Fund Investor Class
3.28%9.23%4.96%8.28%-11.09%2.79%8.54%10.59%-0.76%6.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FFOPX and FIKFX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2015

0.75

The correlation between FFOPX and FIKFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (10 years) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFOPX vs. FIKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFOPX
FFOPX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FFOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FFOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FIKFX
FIKFX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FIKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFOPX vs. FIKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Retirement Fund Investor Class (FIKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFOPXFIKFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.20

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.32

9.13

+0.19

FFOPX vs. FIKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFOPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the FIKFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFOPX and FIKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFOPX vs. FIKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFOPX drawdown since its inception was -30.71%, which is greater than FIKFX's maximum drawdown of -15.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFOPX and FIKFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFOPXFIKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.71%

-15.03%

-15.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-3.32%

-5.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.72%

-3.82%

-10.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-15.03%

-11.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.71%

-15.03%

-15.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-0.87%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-1.71%

-2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

0.80%

+1.36%

Volatility

FFOPX vs. FIKFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOPX) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Retirement Fund Investor Class (FIKFX) at 1.38%. This indicates that FFOPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFOPXFIKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

1.38%

+2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

3.85%

+6.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

4.44%

+8.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

5.21%

+9.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

4.48%

+10.68%

FFOPX vs. FIKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFOPX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FIKFX's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FFOPX vs. FIKFX - Dividend Comparison

FFOPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than FIKFX's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFOPX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Institutional Premium Class
1.81%2.01%2.04%1.98%2.07%2.05%1.97%15.21%2.32%2.09%2.14%2.01%
FIKFX
Fidelity Freedom Index Retirement Fund Investor Class
2.88%3.40%3.13%2.85%3.06%2.04%2.18%7.27%2.94%1.89%1.65%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFOPX and FIKFX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFOPX has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to FIKFX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFOPX dropped -30.71% vs FIKFX's -15.03%.

FIKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFOPX and FIKFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer