PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFOLX vs. FRHMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFOLX vs. FRHMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOLX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFOLX achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly lower than FRHMX's 1,464,383.96% return.


FFOLX

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.75%
YTD
11.53%
6M
10.93%
1Y
26.40%
3Y*
18.89%
5Y*
9.81%
10Y*
12.21%

FRHMX

1D
1,410,365.12%
1M
1,421,616.96%
YTD
1,464,383.96%
6M
1,464,432.61%
1Y
1,543,480.72%
3Y*
2,494.75%
5Y*
596.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFOLX vs. FRHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FFOLX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Fund Institutional Premium Class
11.53%21.44%14.19%19.95%-18.18%15.98%16.51%8.03%
FRHMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6
1,464,383.96%10.02%4.50%8.28%-11.48%2.98%8.79%3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FFOLX and FRHMX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.74

The correlation between FFOLX and FRHMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.85 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFOLX vs. FRHMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFOLX
FFOLX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FFOLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFOLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFOLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFOLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFOLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FRHMX
FRHMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FRHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FRHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFOLX vs. FRHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOLX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFOLXFRHMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-488,363.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

68,097.73

-68,096.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

470,348.34

-470,345.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.34

1,985,653.35

-1,985,640.01

FFOLX vs. FRHMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFOLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the FRHMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFOLX and FRHMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFOLX vs. FRHMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFOLX drawdown since its inception was -30.72%, which is greater than FRHMX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFOLX and FRHMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFOLXFRHMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.72%

-15.96%

-14.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-3.42%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.71%

-4.90%

-9.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-15.96%

-10.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

0.00%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-3.49%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

0.81%

+1.25%

Volatility

FFOLX vs. FRHMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFOLX) is 4.90%, while Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX) has a volatility of 955.41%. This indicates that FFOLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFOLXFRHMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

955.41%

-950.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

955.40%

-945.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

1,413,171.78%

-1,413,159.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.49%

631,989.64%

-631,975.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.21%

538,904.02%

-538,888.81%

FFOLX vs. FRHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFOLX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FRHMX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FFOLX vs. FRHMX - Dividend Comparison

FFOLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than FRHMX's 103.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFOLX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Fund Institutional Premium Class
1.94%2.06%2.04%1.98%2.08%2.03%1.97%14.93%2.30%1.94%2.05%2.02%
FRHMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6
103.07%3.22%3.24%3.02%4.77%3.78%2.61%1.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFOLX and FRHMX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRHMX has higher volatility (955.41%) compared to FFOLX (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFOLX dropped -30.72% vs FRHMX's -15.96%.

FFOLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFOLX and FRHMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer