PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFLDX vs. PADLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFLDX vs. PADLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund (FFLDX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLDX achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than PADLX's 4.70% return.


FFLDX

1D
0.35%
1M
4.70%
YTD
12.15%
6M
13.48%
1Y
28.47%
3Y*
19.43%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*
12.03%

PADLX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.57%
YTD
4.70%
6M
5.52%
1Y
13.99%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
4.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFLDX vs. PADLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FFLDX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund
12.15%21.48%14.18%19.93%-17.32%15.93%15.63%
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.70%10.83%8.34%11.01%-12.54%2.93%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FFLDX and PADLX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.86

The correlation between FFLDX and PADLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFLDX vs. PADLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLDX
FFLDX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FFLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

PADLX
PADLX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PADLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PADLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PADLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PADLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PADLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLDX vs. PADLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund (FFLDX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFLDXPADLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.50

3.10

-0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.45

4.61

-1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.62

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

3.87

-0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.24

16.98

-2.74

FFLDX vs. PADLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the PADLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLDX and PADLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFLDXPADLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

3.10

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.61

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.65

+0.08

Drawdowns

FFLDX vs. PADLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLDX drawdown since its inception was -30.72%, which is greater than PADLX's maximum drawdown of -18.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLDX and PADLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFLDXPADLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.72%

-18.87%

-11.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.06%

-3.63%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.74%

-6.63%

-8.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-18.87%

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.09%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-4.84%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

0.83%

+1.21%

Volatility

FFLDX vs. PADLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund (FFLDX) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX) at 1.57%. This indicates that FFLDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PADLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFLDXPADLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

1.57%

+1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

3.62%

+5.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.71%

4.55%

+7.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

6.65%

+7.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.17%

7.51%

+7.66%

FFLDX vs. PADLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLDX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PADLX's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FFLDX vs. PADLX - Dividend Comparison

FFLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than PADLX's 4.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFLDX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund
1.71%2.00%2.02%1.96%3.04%1.99%1.91%10.83%2.39%1.97%2.42%2.32%
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.95%5.03%3.71%2.91%1.01%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FFLDX and PADLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFLDX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to PADLX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLDX dropped -30.72% vs PADLX's -18.87%.

PADLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFLDX and PADLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer