PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFLDX vs. FIKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFLDX vs. FIKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund (FFLDX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class (FIKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLDX achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than FIKFX's 4.11% return. Over the past 10 years, FFLDX has outperformed FIKFX with an annualized return of 12.03%, while FIKFX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.23% annualized return.


FFLDX

1D
0.35%
1M
4.70%
YTD
12.15%
6M
13.48%
1Y
28.47%
3Y*
19.43%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*
12.03%

FIKFX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.43%
YTD
4.11%
6M
4.41%
1Y
10.34%
3Y*
7.63%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*
4.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFLDX vs. FIKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFLDX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund
12.15%21.48%14.18%19.93%-17.32%15.93%16.52%26.02%-7.16%20.57%
FIKFX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class
4.11%9.23%4.96%8.28%-11.09%2.79%8.54%10.59%-0.76%6.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FFLDX and FIKFX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.75

The correlation between FFLDX and FIKFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (5 years) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFLDX vs. FIKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLDX
FFLDX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FFLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FIKFX
FIKFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FIKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLDX vs. FIKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund (FFLDX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class (FIKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFLDXFIKFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.50

2.58

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.45

3.85

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.53

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

3.14

+0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.24

14.01

+0.23

FFLDX vs. FIKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FIKFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLDX and FIKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFLDXFIKFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.58

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.63

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.96

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.01

-0.29

Drawdowns

FFLDX vs. FIKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLDX drawdown since its inception was -30.72%, which is greater than FIKFX's maximum drawdown of -15.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLDX and FIKFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFLDXFIKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.72%

-15.03%

-15.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.06%

-3.32%

-5.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.74%

-4.76%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-15.03%

-11.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.72%

-15.03%

-15.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-1.72%

-2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

0.74%

+1.30%

Volatility

FFLDX vs. FIKFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund (FFLDX) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class (FIKFX) at 1.49%. This indicates that FFLDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFLDXFIKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

1.49%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

3.31%

+6.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.71%

3.99%

+7.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

5.12%

+9.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.17%

4.44%

+10.73%

FFLDX vs. FIKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLDX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FIKFX's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FFLDX vs. FIKFX - Dividend Comparison

FFLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than FIKFX's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFLDX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund
1.71%2.00%2.02%1.96%3.04%1.99%1.91%10.83%2.39%1.97%2.42%2.32%
FIKFX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class
3.20%3.40%3.13%2.85%3.06%2.04%2.18%7.27%2.94%1.89%1.65%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFLDX and FIKFX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFLDX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to FIKFX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLDX dropped -30.72% vs FIKFX's -15.03%.

FIKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFLDX and FIKFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer