PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFLDX vs. FBGLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFLDX vs. FBGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund (FFLDX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class Z6 (FBGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLDX achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly lower than FBGLX's 13.37% return.


FFLDX

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.79%
YTD
11.91%
6M
11.33%
1Y
26.85%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
12.38%

FBGLX

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.97%
YTD
13.37%
6M
12.91%
1Y
28.39%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFLDX vs. FBGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFLDX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund
11.91%21.48%14.18%19.93%-17.32%15.93%16.52%26.02%-7.16%9.63%
FBGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class Z6
13.37%23.38%13.98%19.58%-17.92%16.31%17.89%26.90%-7.99%9.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FFLDX and FBGLX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.99

The correlation between FFLDX and FBGLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFLDX vs. FBGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLDX
FFLDX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FFLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGLX
FBGLX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FBGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FBGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLDX vs. FBGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund (FFLDX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class Z6 (FBGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFLDXFBGLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.40

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

2.99

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.34

12.90

+0.44

FFLDX vs. FBGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the FBGLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLDX and FBGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFLDX vs. FBGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLDX drawdown since its inception was -30.72%, roughly equal to the maximum FBGLX drawdown of -31.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLDX and FBGLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFLDXFBGLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.72%

-31.28%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.06%

-9.88%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.74%

-15.04%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-27.11%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.21%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-5.43%

+0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.28%

-0.19%

Volatility

FFLDX vs. FBGLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund (FFLDX) is 5.06%, while Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class Z6 (FBGLX) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that FFLDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFLDXFBGLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

5.68%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

11.75%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.51%

13.76%

-1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.56%

15.15%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.22%

16.09%

-0.87%

FFLDX vs. FBGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLDX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGLX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFLDX vs. FBGLX - Dividend Comparison

FFLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than FBGLX's 6.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2055 Fund Class Z6
6.36%5.51%1.77%1.99%11.09%9.48%5.16%6.86%10.56%2.74%0.00%0.00%
FFLDX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund
1.72%2.00%2.02%1.96%3.04%1.99%1.91%10.83%2.39%1.97%2.42%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FFLDX and FBGLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FBGLX has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to FFLDX (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLDX dropped -30.72% vs FBGLX's -31.28%.

FFLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFLDX and FBGLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer