PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FFH.TO vs. XQQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FFH.TO vs. XQQ.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FFH.TO (Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited) is a stock, while XQQ.TO (iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. Over the past 10 years, FFH.TO returned 14.90%/yr vs 19.59%/yr for XQQ.TO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FFH.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (FFH.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFH.TO achieves a -15.38% return, which is significantly lower than XQQ.TO's 19.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FFH.TO has underperformed XQQ.TO with an annualized return of 14.90%, while XQQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.59% annualized return.

FFH.TO

1D
1.21%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
-15.38%
6M
-7.10%
1Y
-3.91%
3Y*
32.17%
5Y*
32.86%
10Y*
14.90%

XQQ.TO

1D
-0.54%
1M
8.62%
YTD
19.17%
6M
17.53%
1Y
37.37%
3Y*
26.17%
5Y*
15.19%
10Y*
19.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFH.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFH.TO
Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited		-15.38%32.22%66.26%54.96%31.51%47.29%-27.31%3.63%-8.51%5.45%
XQQ.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		19.17%18.38%24.23%52.23%-33.67%22.29%45.23%37.48%-2.33%31.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FFH.TO and XQQ.TO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2011

0.16

The correlation between FFH.TO and XQQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited

iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with FFH.TO:
FFH.TO vs. BRK-BFFH.TO vs. MKLFFH.TO vs. IFC.TOFFH.TO vs. VOOFFH.TO vs. FRFHFFFH.TO vs. EQB.TOFFH.TO vs. ONEX.TO
Often compared with XQQ.TO:
XQQ.TO vs. QQC.TOXQQ.TO vs. VFV.TOXQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TOXQQ.TO vs. XQQU.TOXQQ.TO vs. QQQXQQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TOXQQ.TO vs. TEC.TO

Return for Risk

FFH.TO vs. XQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FFH.TO
FFH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FFH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FFH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO
XQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFH.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (FFH.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FFH.TOXQQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.17
2.37

-2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.08
3.12

-3.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.41

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

2.94

-3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.48

10.98

-11.46

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFH.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFH.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the XQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFH.TO and XQQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FFH.TOXQQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

2.37

-2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.38

0.68

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.88

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.86

-0.39

Drawdowns

FFH.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFH.TO drawdown since its inception was -88.18%, which is greater than XQQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -38.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFH.TO and XQQ.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FFH.TOXQQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.18%

-38.55%

-49.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.88%

-12.76%

-6.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.88%

-22.72%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.88%

-38.55%

+19.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.23%

-38.55%

-17.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.65%

-0.80%

-14.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.42%

-5.92%

-21.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.19%

3.41%

+4.78%

Volatility

FFH.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (FFH.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) at 4.51%. This indicates that FFH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XQQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FFH.TOXQQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.31%

4.51%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.42%

12.01%

+6.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.64%

15.82%

+6.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.00%

22.51%

+1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.57%

22.34%

+3.23%

Dividends

FFH.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

FFH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than XQQ.TO's 0.21% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFH.TO
Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited		0.95%0.82%1.01%1.10%1.56%2.05%3.01%2.17%2.07%1.97%2.24%1.82%
XQQ.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		0.21%0.25%0.32%0.31%0.43%0.17%0.26%0.46%0.52%0.53%0.76%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

FFH.TO and XQQ.TO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFH.TO and XQQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer