PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFGZX vs. MURMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFGZX vs. MURMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) and Mutual of America 2045 Retirement Fund (MURMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGZX achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than MURMX's 9.97% return.


FFGZX

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.00%
6M
2.82%
YTD
3.65%
1Y
8.21%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
2.91%
10Y*
4.10%

MURMX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.25%
6M
7.43%
YTD
9.97%
1Y
19.31%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGZX vs. MURMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.65%9.13%5.02%8.32%-11.07%2.85%8.59%
MURMX
Mutual of America 2045 Retirement Fund
9.97%17.76%13.85%15.43%-16.20%17.37%891.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGZX and MURMX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020

0.60

The correlation between FFGZX and MURMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (5 years) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFGZX vs. MURMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGZX
FFGZX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FFGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

MURMX
MURMX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MURMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MURMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MURMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
MURMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MURMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGZX vs. MURMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) and Mutual of America 2045 Retirement Fund (MURMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFGZXMURMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.51

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.29

11.59

-1.30

FFGZX vs. MURMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the MURMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGZX and MURMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFGZX vs. MURMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGZX drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum MURMX drawdown of -32.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGZX and MURMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFGZXMURMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-32.65%

+17.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.33%

-8.34%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.76%

-14.67%

+9.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.94%

-23.56%

+8.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.18%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

-5.40%

+3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

1.73%

-0.95%

Volatility

FFGZX vs. MURMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) is 1.69%, while Mutual of America 2045 Retirement Fund (MURMX) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that FFGZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MURMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFGZXMURMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.69%

3.94%

-2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.78%

9.19%

-5.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.38%

11.81%

-7.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.15%

16.79%

-11.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.46%

377.24%

-372.78%

FFGZX vs. MURMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FFGZX and MURMX have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FFGZX vs. MURMX - Dividend Comparison

FFGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than MURMX's 8.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.07%3.30%3.18%2.88%3.11%2.10%2.22%7.35%3.00%1.95%1.56%1.06%
MURMX
Mutual of America 2045 Retirement Fund
8.09%8.79%8.17%2.95%11.94%4.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFGZX and MURMX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MURMX has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to FFGZX (1.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGZX dropped -14.94% vs MURMX's -32.65%.

FFGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFGZX and MURMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer