PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFFFX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFFFX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund (FFFFX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFFFX achieves a 12.13% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FFFFX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 11.98%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.


FFFFX

1D
0.56%
1M
4.48%
YTD
12.13%
6M
13.76%
1Y
28.02%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
9.53%
10Y*
11.98%

FCNTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.65%
YTD
7.76%
6M
10.05%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
17.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFFFX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFFFX
Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund
12.13%22.01%13.20%20.06%-18.31%16.57%18.24%25.38%-8.94%22.26%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
7.76%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FFFFX and FCNTX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2000

0.91

The correlation between FFFFX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFFFX vs. FCNTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FFFFX
FCNTX

Technology

23.3%
27.0%

Financial Services

17.0%
13.8%

Industrials

15.4%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.8%
9.2%

Communication Services

7.9%
21.2%

Basic Materials

5.6%
2.1%

Energy

5.6%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
3.7%

Utilities

1.8%
0.5%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.1%

Technology

FFFFX
23.3%
FCNTX
27.0%

Financial Services

FFFFX
17.0%
FCNTX
13.8%

Industrials

FFFFX
15.4%
FCNTX
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FFFFX
9.1%
FCNTX
10.1%

Healthcare

FFFFX
8.8%
FCNTX
9.2%

Communication Services

FFFFX
7.9%
FCNTX
21.2%

Basic Materials

FFFFX
5.6%
FCNTX
2.1%

Energy

FFFFX
5.6%
FCNTX
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

FFFFX
4.5%
FCNTX
3.7%

Utilities

FFFFX
1.8%
FCNTX
0.5%

Real Estate

FFFFX
1.1%
FCNTX
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFFFX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFFFX
FFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFFFX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund (FFFFX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFFFXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.50

1.72

+0.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.46

2.39

+1.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.31

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

2.13

+1.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.39

9.04

+5.35

FFFFX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFFFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFFFX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFFFXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

1.72

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.79

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.89

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.78

-0.39

Drawdowns

FFFFX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFFFX drawdown since its inception was -54.10%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFFX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFFFXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.10%

-49.19%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

-11.30%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.08%

-19.75%

+5.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.21%

-32.59%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.93%

-32.59%

+1.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.53%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.14%

-8.16%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.65%

-0.68%

Volatility

FFFFX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund (FFFFX) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.26%. This indicates that FFFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFFFXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

3.26%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

10.48%

-1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.39%

14.03%

-2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.37%

19.15%

-4.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.07%

19.68%

-4.61%

FFFFX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFFFX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFFFX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FFFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%, more than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.33%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FFFFX
Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund
6.35%5.07%2.63%1.72%12.33%12.09%5.67%6.69%7.97%4.37%4.05%4.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFFFX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFFFX has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to FCNTX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFFFX dropped -54.10% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FFFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFFFX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer