FFFDX vs. TRRBX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFFDX (Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund) and TRRBX (T. Rowe Price Retirement 2020 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, FFFDX returned 7.46%/yr vs 7.18%/yr for TRRBX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FFFDX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for TRRBX.

Performance

FFFDX vs. TRRBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund (FFFDX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2020 Fund (TRRBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFFDX achieves a 7.12% return, which is significantly higher than TRRBX's 6.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FFFDX having a 7.46% annualized return and TRRBX not far behind at 7.18%.

FFFDX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 2.57%
• YTD: 7.12%
• 6M: 7.81%
• 1Y: 17.16%
• 3Y*: 11.93%
• 5Y*: 5.11%
• 10Y*: 7.46%

TRRBX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 2.63%
• YTD: 6.59%
• 6M: 0.77%
• 1Y: 8.85%
• 3Y*: 9.79%
• 5Y*: 4.42%
• 10Y*: 7.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFFDX vs. TRRBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFFDX Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund	7.12%	14.87%	7.32%	12.85%	-16.06%	8.97%	13.81%	17.97%	-5.30%	13.88%
TRRBX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2020 Fund	6.59%	6.07%	9.17%	13.51%	-14.58%	10.60%	13.18%	19.39%	-5.01%	15.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FFFDX and TRRBX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2002	0.95

The correlation between FFFDX and TRRBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFFDX vs. TRRBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFFDX

FFFDX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FFFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FFFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FFFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FFFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FFFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

TRRBX

TRRBX Risk / Return Rank: 15
TRRBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
TRRBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
TRRBX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
TRRBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
TRRBX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFFDX vs. TRRBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund (FFFDX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2020 Fund (TRRBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFFDX	TRRBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	1.09	+1.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	1.36	+2.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.25	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	1.20	+1.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.74	3.48	+10.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFFDX vs. TRRBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFFDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the TRRBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFFDX and TRRBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFFDX	TRRBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	1.09	+1.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.48	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	0.75	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.62	-0.05

Drawdowns

FFFDX vs. TRRBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFFDX drawdown since its inception was -45.53%, roughly equal to the maximum TRRBX drawdown of -47.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFDX and TRRBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFFDX	TRRBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.53%	-47.04%	+1.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.50%	-7.68%	+2.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.75%	-8.24%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.58%	-20.54%	-2.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.58%	-23.90%	+1.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.06%	-5.04%	-2.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.26%	2.61%	-1.35%

Volatility

FFFDX vs. TRRBX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund (FFFDX) has a higher volatility of 2.61% compared to T. Rowe Price Retirement 2020 Fund (TRRBX) at 2.11%. This indicates that FFFDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRRBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFFDX	TRRBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.61%	2.11%	+0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.79%	7.67%	-1.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.95%	8.46%	-1.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.89%	9.20%	-0.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.99%	9.67%	-0.68%

FFFDX vs. TRRBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFFDX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than TRRBX's 0.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFFDX vs. TRRBX - Dividend Comparison

FFFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, while TRRBX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFFDX Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund	7.57%	7.36%	4.67%	2.63%	9.81%	12.06%	6.88%	6.54%	7.10%	2.95%	3.62%	3.92%
TRRBX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2020 Fund	0.00%	0.00%	4.28%	6.78%	13.33%	12.99%	9.80%	5.52%	9.63%	4.79%	1.76%	2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFFDX and TRRBX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FFFDX and TRRBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FFFDX or TRRBX?

FFFDX has higher volatility (2.61%) compared to TRRBX (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFFDX dropped -45.53% vs TRRBX's -47.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFFDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.