PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFFAX vs. TRRLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFFAX vs. TRRLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Income Fund (FFFAX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund (TRRLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFFAX achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly lower than TRRLX's 11.85% return. Over the past 10 years, FFFAX has underperformed TRRLX with an annualized return of 4.54%, while TRRLX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.20% annualized return.


FFFAX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.73%
YTD
4.96%
6M
5.27%
1Y
11.56%
3Y*
8.09%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*
4.54%

TRRLX

1D
0.47%
1M
4.68%
YTD
11.85%
6M
8.26%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
17.36%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
11.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFFAX vs. TRRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFFAX
Fidelity Freedom Income Fund
4.96%10.42%4.34%8.18%-11.33%3.12%8.93%10.74%-1.99%8.21%
TRRLX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund
11.85%14.54%14.22%20.87%-19.22%17.50%18.46%25.39%-7.62%20.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FFFAX and TRRLX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2014

0.72

The correlation between FFFAX and TRRLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (5 years) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFFAX vs. TRRLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFFAX
FFFAX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FFFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

TRRLX
TRRLX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
TRRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFFAX vs. TRRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Income Fund (FFFAX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund (TRRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFFAXTRRLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.34

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

2.31

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.02

9.63

+4.39

FFFAX vs. TRRLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the TRRLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFFAX and TRRLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFFAXTRRLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

1.81

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.56

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

0.73

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.63

+0.42

Drawdowns

FFFAX vs. TRRLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFFAX drawdown since its inception was -17.96%, smaller than the maximum TRRLX drawdown of -32.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFAX and TRRLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFFAXTRRLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.96%

-32.52%

+14.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.68%

-9.82%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.91%

-15.59%

+10.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.87%

-28.09%

+12.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.87%

-32.52%

+16.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.79%

-5.17%

+3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

2.32%

-1.49%

Volatility

FFFAX vs. TRRLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Income Fund (FFFAX) is 1.86%, while T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund (TRRLX) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that FFFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRRLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFFAXTRRLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.86%

3.56%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.87%

10.40%

-6.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.57%

12.54%

-7.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.37%

15.27%

-9.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.64%

15.52%

-10.88%

FFFAX vs. TRRLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFFAX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than TRRLX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFFAX vs. TRRLX - Dividend Comparison

FFFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, while TRRLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFAX
Fidelity Freedom Income Fund
2.97%3.29%3.13%2.92%5.89%6.12%4.37%3.65%5.17%3.74%3.21%3.28%
TRRLX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund
0.00%0.00%1.74%3.29%5.75%4.19%2.38%4.33%5.39%1.58%1.58%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFFAX and TRRLX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRRLX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to FFFAX (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFFAX dropped -17.96% vs TRRLX's -32.52%.

FFFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFFAX and TRRLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer