PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFEDX vs. LTFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFEDX vs. LTFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFEDX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFEDX achieves a 6.65% return, which is significantly lower than LTFIX's 8.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FFEDX has underperformed LTFIX with an annualized return of 7.99%, while LTFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.50% annualized return.


FFEDX

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.18%
YTD
6.65%
6M
6.98%
1Y
16.72%
3Y*
12.40%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*
7.99%

LTFIX

1D
-0.83%
1M
2.92%
YTD
8.75%
6M
9.13%
1Y
21.71%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
11.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFEDX vs. LTFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFEDX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Institutional Premium Class
6.65%14.93%8.54%13.94%-16.55%9.63%13.60%19.68%-4.46%15.20%
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
8.75%17.80%17.28%20.33%-18.84%17.73%16.47%27.27%-9.03%22.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FFEDX and LTFIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.94

The correlation between FFEDX and LTFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFEDX vs. LTFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFEDX
FFEDX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FFEDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFEDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFEDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FFEDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFEDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

LTFIX
LTFIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
LTFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LTFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFEDX vs. LTFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFEDX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFEDXLTFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.34

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

2.52

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.87

11.34

+1.54

FFEDX vs. LTFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFEDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the LTFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFEDX and LTFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFEDXLTFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

1.85

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.59

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.73

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.46

+0.28

Drawdowns

FFEDX vs. LTFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFEDX drawdown since its inception was -22.60%, smaller than the maximum LTFIX drawdown of -52.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEDX and LTFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFEDXLTFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.60%

-52.73%

+30.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.93%

-8.71%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.59%

-15.70%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.60%

-26.80%

+4.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.60%

-33.50%

+10.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.83%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-7.64%

+3.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

1.93%

-0.59%

Volatility

FFEDX vs. LTFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFEDX) is 2.51%, while Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that FFEDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFEDXLTFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

3.46%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.92%

9.48%

-3.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.29%

11.87%

-4.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.53%

15.46%

-5.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.89%

15.84%

-5.95%

FFEDX vs. LTFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFEDX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than LTFIX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FFEDX vs. LTFIX - Dividend Comparison

FFEDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than LTFIX's 8.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFEDX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.36%4.95%3.40%2.42%2.69%2.21%2.40%13.80%2.37%1.88%1.94%1.89%
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
8.02%8.73%8.47%4.17%8.60%5.83%3.91%6.03%6.60%3.51%3.99%4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FFEDX and LTFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LTFIX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to FFEDX (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFEDX dropped -22.60% vs LTFIX's -52.73%.

FFEDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFEDX and LTFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer