FFEB vs. MVOL.L
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L).
FFEB and MVOL.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FFEB is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Feb 21, 2020. MVOL.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Nov 30, 2012.
Performance
FFEB vs. MVOL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFEB vs. MVOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February | -1.36% | 13.76% | 16.64% | 19.95% | -7.51% | 16.26% | 9.83% |
MVOL.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS | -0.64% | 11.02% | 11.08% | 7.28% | -9.62% | 14.65% | 0.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFEB achieves a -1.36% return, which is significantly lower than MVOL.L's -0.64% return.
FFEB
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- -3.34%
- YTD
- -1.36%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 14.47%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.99%
- 10Y*
- —
MVOL.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -5.10%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- 1Y
- 2.57%
- 3Y*
- 8.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 7.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFEB vs. MVOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MVOL.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFEB vs. MVOL.L — Risk / Return Rank
FFEB
MVOL.L
FFEB vs. MVOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFEB | MVOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 0.24 | +0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.76 | 0.38 | +1.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.06 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 0.25 | +1.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.15 | 1.02 | +8.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFEB | MVOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 0.24 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 0.56 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.73 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFEB and MVOL.L is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FFEB vs. MVOL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FFEB nor MVOL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FFEB vs. MVOL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFEB drawdown since its inception was -22.81%, smaller than the maximum MVOL.L drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEB and MVOL.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFEB | MVOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.81% | -28.82% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.65% | -8.14% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.85% | -18.52% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.87% | -5.10% | +1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.46% | -3.33% | +0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 1.96% | -0.34% |
Volatility
FFEB vs. MVOL.L - Volatility Comparison
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) at 3.09%. This indicates that FFEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVOL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFEB | MVOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 3.09% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.65% | 5.41% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.39% | 10.86% | +1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.88% | 10.66% | +0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 11.65% | +2.25% |