FFBQX vs. FCNTX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FFBQX (Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both mutual funds - FFBQX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Fidelity, while FCNTX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FFBQX returned 10.97%/yr vs 14.58%/yr for FCNTX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FFBQX charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.

Performance

FFBQX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFBQX achieves a 14.48% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 8.62% return.

FFBQX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 3.01%
• YTD: 14.48%
• 6M: 13.89%
• 1Y: 30.65%
• 3Y*: 21.44%
• 5Y*: 10.97%
• 10Y*: —

FCNTX

• 1D: -2.12%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 8.62%
• 6M: 7.74%
• 1Y: 22.83%
• 3Y*: 26.52%
• 5Y*: 14.58%
• 10Y*: 18.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFBQX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FFBQX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6	14.48%	22.90%	16.84%	20.67%	-18.86%	16.47%	18.10%	9.13%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	8.62%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	8.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FFBQX and FCNTX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019	0.85

The correlation between FFBQX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFBQX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFBQX

FFBQX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FFBQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FFBQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FFBQX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FFBQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FFBQX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 37
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFBQX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFBQX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	1.61	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	2.22	+0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.29	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	2.14	+1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.27	8.97	+5.30

FFBQX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFBQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFBQX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFBQX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFBQX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFBQX and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFBQX	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.34%	-49.19%	+17.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	-11.30%	+1.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.51%	-19.75%	+4.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.60%	-32.59%	+4.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-2.59%	+2.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.93%	-8.15%	+2.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	2.69%	-0.47%

Volatility

FFBQX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFBQX) is 5.72%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that FFBQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFBQX	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.72%	6.33%	-0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.56%	11.87%	-0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.65%	15.10%	-1.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.27%	19.32%	-4.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.30%	19.76%	-2.46%

FFBQX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFBQX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFBQX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FFBQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than FCNTX's 4.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.30%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%
FFBQX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class K6	3.31%	2.58%	5.66%	2.07%	5.40%	6.98%	3.62%	2.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFBQX and FCNTX in my portfolio?

FFBQX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFBQX or FCNTX?

FCNTX has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to FFBQX (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFBQX dropped -31.34% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFBQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.