FEXD.L vs. XMUS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FEXD.L (First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B) and XMUS.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from First Trust and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEXD.L returned 12.39%/yr vs 16.21%/yr for XMUS.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEXD.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XMUS.L.

Performance

FEXD.L vs. XMUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B (FEXD.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEXD.L achieves a 14.06% return, which is significantly higher than XMUS.L's 10.47% return. Over the past 10 years, FEXD.L has underperformed XMUS.L with an annualized return of 12.39%, while XMUS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.21% annualized return.

FEXD.L

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: 14.06%
• 6M: 14.03%
• 1Y: 28.95%
• 3Y*: 16.32%
• 5Y*: 10.82%
• 10Y*: 12.39%

XMUS.L

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 5.64%
• YTD: 10.47%
• 6M: 10.29%
• 1Y: 28.80%
• 3Y*: 19.24%
• 5Y*: 14.65%
• 10Y*: 16.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEXD.L vs. XMUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FEXD.L First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B	14.06%	6.55%	17.43%	7.00%	-3.00%	26.00%	9.31%	21.74%	-6.95%	9.63%
XMUS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C	10.47%	9.35%	27.51%	20.67%	-10.46%	29.34%	16.78%	26.80%	0.08%	10.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FEXD.L and XMUS.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2015	0.69

The correlation between FEXD.L and XMUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FEXD.L vs. XMUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEXD.L

FEXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
FEXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FEXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FEXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FEXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FEXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 95

XMUS.L

XMUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 79
XMUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
XMUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
XMUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
XMUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
XMUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEXD.L vs. XMUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B (FEXD.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEXD.L	XMUS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.19	2.69	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.43	3.59	+0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.50	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.72	3.73	+4.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.19	12.95	+15.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEXD.L vs. XMUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEXD.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is comparable to the XMUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEXD.L and XMUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEXD.L	XMUS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.19	2.69	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	1.01	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88	1.03	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.75	+0.05

Drawdowns

FEXD.L vs. XMUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEXD.L drawdown since its inception was -31.91%, smaller than the maximum XMUS.L drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEXD.L and XMUS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEXD.L	XMUS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.91%	-34.33%	+2.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.52%	-7.68%	+3.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.63%	-21.47%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.63%	-21.47%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.91%	-25.90%	-6.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-0.17%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.35%	-4.71%	+0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.88%	2.22%	+2.66%

Volatility

FEXD.L vs. XMUS.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B (FEXD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMUS.L) at 2.63%. This indicates that FEXD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEXD.L	XMUS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.73%	2.63%	+1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.14%	7.26%	+1.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.33%	10.65%	+1.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.33%	14.55%	+1.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.76%	15.72%	+3.04%

FEXD.L vs. XMUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEXD.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XMUS.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEXD.L vs. XMUS.L - Dividend Comparison

FEXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while XMUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FEXD.L First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%
XMUS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEXD.L and XMUS.L in my portfolio?

FEXD.L and XMUS.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FEXD.L or XMUS.L?

On fees, XMUS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEXD.L or XMUS.L?

XMUS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FEXD.L.

What is the main difference between FEXD.L and XMUS.L?

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FEXD.L and 0.15% for XMUS.L.